arXiv:2607. 10212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance.
By Nipun Misra, Vikranth Udandarao, Aanchal Gupta, Yogender Kumar, Manuj Mukherjee, Raghava Mutharaju
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance. Existing evaluation practices rely heavily on task-specific metrics or small-scale manual verification, offering limited insight into the structural and semantic fidelity of extracted graphs.
arXiv:2606. 09105v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating novel, feasible, and high-quality research ideas is an important yet challenging task in scientific discovery.
By Xu Li, Hanzhe Tu, Xun Han
arXiv:2606. 19351v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning infers new knowledge from existing facts and is widely applied in question answering, recommendation, and decision support.
By Xinyan Zhu, Yaoqi Liu, Yue Gao, Huadong Ma, Cheng Yang, Chuan Shi
arXiv:2608. 07023v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Organizing thousands of unstandardized, multilingual expertise declarations is a persistent challenge for Human Resources (HR) platforms, directly impacting downstream tasks like accurate talent matching.
By Emma Jouffroy, Warren Jouanneau, Marc Palyart
The paper presents an end‑to‑end pipeline for automatically constructing a tree‑structured knowledge graph (KG) from Vietnamese high school history textbooks and evaluating retrieval strategies that exploit the KG’s hierarchical structure. The KG construction uses a three‑phase hybrid relation extraction process, including intra‑batch deduplication, approximate cross‑batch search, and LLM extraction with a centroid filter and dual‑LLM validator, resulting in 750 nodes and 4,341 semantic edges across 41 ontology types. Retrieval evaluation compares three graph traversal strategies—Top‑Down, Horizontal, and Bottom‑Up—on a benchmark of 1,210 Vietnamese queries, finding that the Top‑Down strategy with structural information outperforms a vector baseline by 4.7 percentage points in NDCG@10.
By Ket Doan Nguyen, Minh N. H. Nguyen