The study clusters 5,000 EdNet-KT3 learners into eight study‑strategy groups based on early‑session behaviors such as resource use, revision, video watching, and problem practice. These clusters predict later engagement metrics—like continued practice and session completion—but do not reliably forecast later unassisted accuracy or mastery. The findings suggest that behavioral clustering captures learning styles and engagement patterns rather than knowledge gains.
By Qingchuan Lyu, Yingxin Li, Albert Yang
arXiv:2606. 10254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved near-perfect performance in \emph{solving} high-school mathematics, their ability to \emph{evaluate} the diverse reasoning processes of real human students remains under-examined.
By Yiteng Mao, Kenan Xu, Yijia Lyu, Wenhao Li, Jianlong Chen, Xiangfeng Wang
arXiv:2606. 15349v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standardized examinations are typically treated as uniform syllabus coverage problems.
By Joy Bose, Om Thomas
arXiv:2608. 15630v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid development and growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) have made it increasingly important to understand their capabilities.
By Alona Strugatski, Licol Zeinfeld, Giora Alexandron
arXiv:2603. 13761v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Curriculum learning--ordering training examples in a sequence to aid machine learning--takes inspiration from human learning, but has not gained widespread acceptance.
By Amogh Inamdar, Zhenwei Tang, Ashton Anderson, Richard Zemel
arXiv:2601. 02580v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Traditional methods for determining assessment item parameters, such as difficulty and discrimination, rely heavily on expensive field testing to collect student performance data for Item Response Theory (IRT) calibration.
By Christopher Ormerod