arXiv AI By Bowen Xu

Anti-Goal Reasoning: Rethinking the Theory of Goal Reasoning in Non-Axiomatic Logic

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 20902v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Goal reasoning in Non-Axiomatic Logic (NAL) explains how an adaptive system derives means for realizing desired events under insufficient knowledge and resources.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 18

The syntax and semantics of goals

The article discusses goals as cognitive states that combine with world knowledge to guide purposeful behavior, emphasizing their compositional nature and relation to rational action. It draws parallels between goal representations and the syntax‑semantics interface in linguistics and logic, highlighting questions about expressivity, design, and efficiency of different goal languages. The authors synthesize research on goal representation properties, propose a broader design space, and suggest that distinguishing form and meaning can clarify assumptions, inform cognition‑motivation interactions, and identify variation axes in goal conceptions.

By David M. Abel, Mark K. Ho