arXiv AI By Hyunkyung Han, Min Jung Kim

Anatomically Faithful but Temporally Diffuse: Auditing Attribution for Left-Ventricular Ejection-Fraction Estimation from Echocardiography

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 13738v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep video models estimate left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from echocardiography with near-expert accuracy, and post-hoc attribution is increasingly used to certify that such models look at the right place.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jul 16

Anatomically Faithful but Temporally Blind: Auditing Attribution for Left-Ventricular Ejection-Fraction Estimation from Echocardiography

arXiv:2607. 13738v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Background and Objective: Deep video models estimate left-ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from echocardiography with near-expert accuracy, and post-hoc attribution (Chefer relevance for transformers, Grad-CAM for CNNs) is increasingly used to certify that models "look at the right place.

By Hyunkyung Han, Min Jung Kim
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

The segmentation ceiling: why explicit left-ventricular masks do not improve learned ejection-fraction regression

The paper introduces the "segmentation ceiling," a quantitative criterion that determines when explicit left‑ventricular (LV) segmentation can improve ejection fraction (EF) regression. By deriving how per‑frame segmentation area error propagates into EF error, the authors find that a break‑even error of about 10% per frame is required, whereas typical segmenters exceed this threshold (~14%). Consequently, several strategies that incorporate segmentation or area information fail to outperform a raw‑video baseline, while techniques such as weight averaging with strong augmentation and a heteroscedastic beta‑NLL loss yield competitive EF predictions and well‑calibrated uncertainty estimates.

By Farshid Farhadi Khouzani, Paul La Plante, Bryar Mustafa Shareef, Laxmi Gewali
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

Learning from Scarce Labels: Multi-View Echocardiography for Ejection Fraction Prediction

The paper introduces the first publicly available dataset of over 25,000 parasternal long‑axis (PLAX) echocardiography videos labeled for left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), created through a novel data‑generation strategy that links clinical notes to video data. Using this dataset, the authors train a reproducible PLAX‑based EF model that achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.86%, comparable to the clinical standard of apical four‑chamber (A4C) methods. They further show that simple late fusion of PLAX and A4C predictions reduces MAE to 6.37%, highlighting the benefit of multi‑view integration, and release the dataset, models, and demos publicly.

By Zhiyuan Gao, Dominic Yurk, Yaser S. Abu-Mostafa
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

Learning from Scarce Labels: Multi-View Echocardiography for Ejection Fraction Prediction

The paper introduces the first publicly available dataset for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from parasternal long-axis (PLAX) echocardiography, comprising over 25,000 labeled videos generated through a novel data‑generation strategy that correlates clinical notes with echocardiographic videos. Using this dataset, the authors train a reproducible PLAX‑EF model that achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.86%, comparable to the clinical standard of apical four‑chamber (A4C) methods. They further show that combining PLAX and A4C predictions via simple late fusion reduces MAE to 6.37%, highlighting the benefit of multi‑view integration, and they release the dataset, models, and demos for community use.