arXiv:2608. 16475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Porous Medium Equation (PME), given by $u_t = \Delta(u^m)$ for $m > 1$, is a degenerate nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation that arises in various physical applications such as fluid flow in porous media, heat transfer in plasmas, and population dynamics.
By Noura Al Helwani, Sophie Moufawad, Nabil Nassif
The Porous Medium Equation (PME), given by $u_t = Δ(u^m)$ for $m > 1$, is a degenerate nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation that arises in various physical applications such as fluid flow...
arXiv:2603. 11250v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Accurate modeling of gas flow through porous media is critical for many technological applications, including reservoir performance prediction, carbon capture and sequestration, and fuel cells and batteries.
By V. S. Maduri, K. B. Nakshatrala
arXiv:2602. 22188v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces.
By Nathalie C. Pinheiro, Donghu Guo, Hannah P. Menke, Aniket C. Joshi, Claire E. Heaney, Ahmed H. ElSheikh, Christopher C. Pain
arXiv:2606. 12337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization, while physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative.
By Zhen Zhang, Alessandro Alla, George Em Karniadakis
The paper evaluates the robustness of Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) against noisy data in inverse problems, comparing them to a finite element method (FEM) plus optimizer baseline. Experiments on viscosity identification in 1D Burgers’ equation and 2D/3D Taylor‑Green Vortex with additive Gaussian noise show that PINNs, while requiring less human expertise, are outperformed by the traditional FEM approach in accuracy (e.g., RMSE 0.01 vs. 0.0013 for 2D Taylor‑Green with σ=1). PINNs do, however, exhibit better scaling with problem complexity, and the study highlights specific training failures that must be addressed for PINNs to become more competitive.
By Aleksandra Jekic, Afroditi Natsaridou, Signe Riemer-S{\o}rensen, Helge Langseth, Odd Erik Gundersen