arXiv Machine Learning By Daniel Wang, Andrew Xu

AllocBench: Measuring Online Tool Allocation Capability in LLM Agents

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 23332v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Creating a reusable tool is an investment: an agent pays a fixed cost now in exchange for the potential of future reuse.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jul 17

OmniaBench: Benchmarking General AI Agents Across Diverse Scenarios

arXiv:2607. 14989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction.

By Chengyu Shen, Yujie Fu, Gangtao Xin, Yanheng Hou, Wenlong Fei, Guojie Zhu, Jiawei Li, Hongcheng Gao, Runming He, Zhen Hao Wong, Meiyi Qiang, Hao Liang, Zhao Cao, Hao Jiang, Chong Chen, Wentao Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

CCTU: A Benchmark for Tool Use under Complex Constraints

CCTU is a new benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on their ability to use tools under complex constraints. It includes 200 test cases that average seven constraint types and 4,700‑token prompts, covering resource, behavior, toolset, and response dimensions. An executable validation module performs step‑level checks, and nine state‑of‑the‑art LLMs were tested, revealing that none exceed a 20% task completion rate when strict constraints are enforced, with frequent violations and limited self‑refinement.

By Junjie Ye, Guoqiang Zhang, Wenjie Fu, Zelin Li, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang