arXiv Machine Learning By Yingying Fan, Yuxuan Han, Jinchi Lv, Xiaocong Xu, Zhengyuan Zhou

Allocation Stability and Wald Inference under Variance-Aware UCB

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The paper investigates when allocation stability is required for Gaussian inference in a two‑armed, fixed‑horizon variance‑aware UCB policy with bounded rewards that may change with the horizon. It establishes a precise criterion involving the reward gap and variances that determines whether the optimal‑arm count can be approximated deterministically with vanishing relative error, while noting that the suboptimal‑arm count is always stable. The authors prove that the ordinary Wald statistic for any fixed nonzero coefficient vector converges to a standard normal distribution provided the product of pull count and reward variance diverges for each arm; however, uniform Gaussian approximation over deterministic coefficient vectors holds only if the optimal‑arm count is stable. The analysis relies on a pathwise comparison with an auxiliary policy and joint limits for the rescaled optimal‑arm count and studentized sample‑mean errors.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Exact Bayes Regret and Asymptotic Optimality in High-Dimensional Gaussian Bandits

The paper analyzes Bayesian linear bandits with isotropic Gaussian parameters, independent Gaussian arms, and Gaussian reward noise when the time horizon scales with the dimension. It derives explicit limits for the normalized posterior uncertainty and parameter overlaps, yielding exact regret curves for several policies—including Thompson sampling, posterior‑mean greedy selection, and scaled‑covariance variants. The results show that posterior‑mean greedy selection achieves the optimal Bayes regret, while Thompson sampling incurs a strictly larger leading regret whose ratio to greedy lies between one and two, approaching two for long horizons.

By Prakhar Singhvi (Abstract Math Institute), Yi Zou (Abstract Math Institute), Abhishek Bhattacharjee (Abstract Math Institute)
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Bandit Simulation for Average Reward Inference

arXiv:2606. 00913v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-arm bandit algorithms are increasingly used in online platforms, clinical trials, and social science experiments, but valid statistical inference on their performance remains an open challenge.

By Samya Praharaj, Chih-Yu Chang, Koulik Khamaru, Kelly W. Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
21h ago

The Price of Current-Effect Inference in Nonstationary Multi-Armed Bandits

The paper studies the trade‑off between maximizing rewards and accurately estimating current treatment effects in nonstationary multi‑armed bandits. For $K$‑armed bandits with H"older‑smooth mean rewards, the authors derive minimax bounds on expected dynamic regret under a high‑probability simultaneous coverage requirement for all current effects. They propose the TRACE algorithm, which achieves a regret–precision trade‑off that separates reward‑learning regret from the unavoidable cost of refreshing current‑effect estimates, and extend the method with an empirical‑Bernstein e‑process to adapt exploration while preserving worst‑case guarantees.

By Sharan Sahu, Martin T. Wells