arXiv AI By Xinyue Liu, Niloofar Mireshghallah, Jane C. Ginsburg, Tuhin Chakrabarty

Alignment Whack-a-Mole : Finetuning Activates Verbatim Recall of Copyrighted Books in Large Language Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper demonstrates that fine‑tuning large language models on a single author’s works can trigger the models to reproduce large verbatim excerpts from copyrighted books, even when prompted only with semantic descriptions. Experiments on GPT‑4o, Gemini‑2.5‑Pro, and DeepSeek‑V3.1 show up to 85‑90% recall of held‑out books, with spans exceeding 460 words, and this effect generalizes across authors and model providers. The findings suggest that fine‑tuning reactivates latent memorization from pre‑training, revealing a widespread vulnerability in industry models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

CopyShield: A Cross-Level Benchmark of Copyright Defenses in LLMs

CopyShield is a benchmark that compares three copyright‑defense methods—contrastive decoding, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and activation intervention—across two large language models (LLaMA‑3.1‑8B and Mistral‑7B‑v0.3). The study uses controlled memorization of five public‑domain books to measure literal leakage, calibrated non‑literal leakage, utility, and degeneracy, finding that each intervention level yields distinct compliance‑utility trade‑offs. Results show contrastive decoding limits degeneracy but hits a suppression floor, DPO nearly eliminates literal leakage yet causes paraphrase‑loop degeneracy, and activation intervention blocks most non‑literal queries before generation, with human evaluation highlighting coherence and perceived copyright risk differences.

By Maryam Alshehyari, Dushyant Singh Chauhan, Samuele Poppi, Martin Takac, Salem Lahlou, Nils Lukas
arXiv AI
Jun 17

Combating Data Laundering in LLM Training

arXiv:2604. 01904v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Post-hoc unauthorized-training data detection for large language models (LLMs) typically assumes a query-with-originals regime: rights holders query a target LLM with raw proprietary data and assess whether the model assigns them stronger memorization-based detection signals, e.

By Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu