arXiv AI By Jennifer Xu, Tamara Babaian

Algorithmic Bias from the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper examines algorithmic bias in machine learning and AI used in healthcare information systems. Using survey and interview data from healthcare professionals in varied roles, it explores how perceptions of bias, fairness, and acceptance differ by job function and algorithm characteristics. The findings highlight the need for further research to ensure fairness and equality in healthcare AI applications.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

On the Societal Impact of Machine Learning

This PhD thesis examines how machine learning (ML) influences society, noting that ML increasingly shapes consequential decisions and recommendations. It highlights the risk of discriminatory effects when fairness is not explicitly considered in data‑driven systems. The work proposes methods for measuring fairness, decomposing ML systems to anticipate bias, and implementing interventions that reduce discrimination while preserving utility, and it outlines future research directions as ML, including generative AI, becomes more integrated into society.

By Joachim Baumann
arXiv AI
Aug 17

Algorithm Design and Physician Liability

arXiv:2608. 13618v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A single clinical algorithm can deliver unequal accuracy across patient groups, and concern about such disparity has grown as artificial intelligence (AI) spreads through clinical decision-making.

By Shujie Luan, Shubhranshu Singh, Tinglong Dai
arXiv AI
Oct 15

AI Model Design and Physician Liability

arXiv:2608.13618v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Clinical algorithms can perform differently across patient groups, a concern that grows as these algorithms increasingly take the form of artificia...

By Shujie Luan, Shubhranshu Singh, Tinglong Dai