Collective intelligence research treats disagreement as evidence of epistemic diversity: if agents express different views, the group should retain capacity to revise. In LLM collectives this proxy can break: agents can produce diverse-looking arguments while preserving the same conclusion.
arXiv:2608. 03722v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Collective intelligence research treats disagreement as evidence of epistemic diversity: if agents express different views, the group should retain capacity to revise.
By Molood Arman
arXiv:2608. 03722v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Collective intelligence research treats disagreement as evidence of epistemic diversity: if agents express different views, the group should retain capacity to revise.
By Molood Arman
arXiv:2606. 07834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM judges increasingly turn verdicts into system commitments.
By Haoran Xu
arXiv:2605. 03534v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds answers in retrieved passages, yet relevance does not guarantee sufficiency: a topical passage may still fail to justify the answer.
By Jingxi Qiu, Zeyu Han, Cheng Huang
The study evaluates safety properties of a controlled MCP-to-A2A agent configuration by measuring verbatim field egress across ten record scenarios under three labeling conditions (CONFIDENTIAL, no header, PUBLIC – OK TO SHARE). Using four models repeated four times each, 480 trials were conducted, and the results show that adding a PUBLIC header is descriptively linked to higher verbatim egress, with the effect varying strongly by model. The study releases code, byte‑pinned traces, and an offline analysis pipeline as a public artifact.
By Arpan Kumar Mahapatra