arXiv AI By Taotao Wang, Lizhao You, Jingwen Tong, Chonghe Zhao, Shengli Zhang

Agentic Peer-to-Peer Networks: From Content Distribution to Capability and Action Sharing

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper discusses how the shift from centralized AI APIs to local edge inference enables Client‑Side Autonomous Agents (CSAAs) that collaborate in Agentic Peer‑to‑Peer (P2P) networks. Unlike traditional P2P systems that exchange static content, these networks share dynamic, heterogeneous capabilities that may be unsafe, necessitating semantic discovery, drift management, and risk‑aware execution. The authors propose a plane‑based reference architecture, signed soft‑state capability descriptors for intent‑aware routing, and a tiered verification spectrum (reputation, canary probes, cryptographic evidence) to align trust costs with task risks, showing improved workflow success in simulations.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Aug 5

WeClawArena: An Auditable Sandbox and Benchmark for Cross-User Agents Collaboration and Security in Human-Centered Agent Networks

arXiv:2608. 03499v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations.

By Prince Zizhuang Wang, Aojie Yuan, Haiyue Zhang, Xiyang Hu, Yue Zhao, Shuli Jiang
arXiv AI
6d ago

GatewayBench: Unified Capability and Security Evaluation Platform for MCP Gateways

GatewayBench is a new evaluation framework that systematically studies how the design of Model Context Protocol (MCP) gateways influences AI agent capability, efficiency, and security. It categorizes gateways into flattened and hierarchical architectures and tests them on 524 tasks across six domains using a pool of 11,118 real-world tools from 251 MCP servers, including task-irrelevant tools to simulate large-scale deployments. Experiments on seven widely deployed gateways reveal significant differences in task completion, tool-use efficiency, and attack resilience, showing strong interactions with the underlying model and agent harness.

By Yitian Zheng, Zhaorun Chen, Haoyu Li, Bo Li
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

WeClawArena: An Auditable Sandbox and Benchmark for Cross-User Agents Collaboration and Security in Human-Centered Agent Networks

Recent advances in persistent personal-agent frameworks are making human-centered agent networks realistic deployment targets: each user can be served by an AI agent that acts on the user's behalf, maintains state, and communicates with other agents through social and task relations. In these networks, everyday tool use becomes multi-party owned-agent collaboration over personal workspaces, where files, records, tools, and policies are not directly visible across owners.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

AgentKernel: The Trust-Native Agentic Operating System

AgentKernel proposes a trust‑native operating system for AI agents, arguing that current governance layers are insufficient because they share the same process trust boundary as the agents. The OS introduces a mandatory enforcement boundary organized into four pillars—Identity, Perception, Cognition, and Execution—each adapting classical OS security principles to address semantic‑level failures such as prompt injection, memory poisoning, and tool misuse. By wrapping the agent lifecycle in this structured, non‑bypassable framework, AgentKernel aims to provide a unified security layer that can enforce identity, input mediation, memory governance, and execution control across the entire agent lifecycle.

By Zhenhua Zou, Sheng Guo, Qiuyang Zhan, Lepeng Zhao, Shuo Li, Zhuotao Liu
arXiv AI
Sep 11

Can AI Agents Detect and Repair Artifact Drift in Network Experiments?

The paper introduces NetArtifactBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate whether AI agents can detect and repair inconsistencies in network experiment records while preserving supported claims. It tests 23 agent configurations on 52 instances with injected inconsistencies, finding an average pass rate of 65.3 % but no runtime exceeding 30 % for complex repairs that require recovering implicit relations and propagating changes across artifacts. The results highlight a clear distinction between local corrections and full record-level repair, leading the authors to argue that artifact integrity should be a primary design and evaluation criterion for AI agents in network systems.

By Tianzhu Zhang, Weichen Tao, Changgang Zheng, Yusheng Zheng, Long Chen, Xiaoyi Fan, Meikang Qiu