arXiv AI By Yongjian Tang, Costel Moraru, Doruk Tuncel, Hanya Elhashemy, Steffen Klepke, Thomas Runkler

Agent4Spec: An LLM-based Agentic System to Optimize API Specifications through Automated Validation and Market Analysis

Read the original on arXiv AI →

Agent4Spec is an LLM-based autonomous multi‑agent system designed to improve API specifications through continuous validation and market analysis. It includes a validation pipeline that detects and self‑corrects OpenAPI syntax errors, and a market analysis pipeline that performs competitive research, identifies functional gaps, and automatically generates missing API‑spec functionalities. In evaluations on curated datasets, the best LLM achieved 100% syntax error detection, over 95% success in implementing corrections, and more than 50% adoption of suggested endpoint improvements.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
6d ago

Agent4Spec: An LLM-based Agentic System to Optimize API Specifications through Automated Validation and Market Analysis

Agent4Spec is an autonomous multi‑agent system that uses large language models to continuously improve API specifications. It includes a validation pipeline that detects and corrects OpenAPI syntax errors, and a market‑analysis pipeline that researches competitors, finds functional gaps, and auto‑generates missing API features. In tests on two curated datasets, the best LLM achieved 100 % syntax error detection, over 95 % success in implementing corrections, and more than 50 % adoption of suggested endpoint improvements.

arXiv AI
Jul 16

AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities

arXiv:2607. 13705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical.

By Zichen Ding, Jiaye Ge, Shufan Jiang, Kai Chen, Mo Li, Qingqiu Li, Zehao Li, Zonglin Li, Tiaohao Liang, Shudong Liu, Zerun Ma, Zixing Shang, Wenhui Tian, Zun Wang, Liwei Wu, Zhenyu Wu, Jun Xu, Bowen Yang, Dingbo Yuan, Qi Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Peiheng Zhou, Dongsheng Zhu
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Agent Seer: Synthesizing Scenarios from Specification Understanding

Agent Seer is a pipeline that automatically synthesizes realistic evaluation scenarios for AI agents that use external tools, using only the tool’s specification (function names, natural‑language descriptions, and typed parameter schemas). Starting from a single Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification, it enriches raw schemas, generates graded scenarios with synthetic tool outputs, and expands them into mock‑data‑grounded multi‑turn dialogues that demonstrate strong tool‑calling correctness and conversational coherence. Across seven diverse MCP specifications, the pipeline achieves high quality, with parameter‑schema complexity emerging as the main driver of quality variation and argument‑value accuracy identified as the dominant failure mode.

By Harish Karumuri, Mahesh Vemula, David Lopes Pegna
arXiv AI
Jun 8

SW-$A^2$-Bench: Benchmarking Autonomous Software Agent Generation for Agentic Web

arXiv:2604. 04226v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Agentic Web is emerging as a paradigm in which autonomous software agents interact with online resources and with each other to accomplish user goals.

By Linyao Chen, Bo Huang, Qinlao Zhao, Shuai Shao, Zhi Han, Zicai Cui, Ziheng Zhang, Guangtao Zeng, Wenzheng Tang, Yikun Wang, Yuanjian Zhou, Zimian Peng, Yong Yu, Weiwen Liu, Hiroki Kobayashi, Weinan Zhang
arXiv AI
6d ago

Agent4RE: A Self-Refining Multi-agent Framework for End-to-End Software Requirements Engineering and Benchmarking

Agent4RE is a self‑refining multi‑agent framework designed for end‑to‑end software requirements engineering (RE). It coordinates specialized agents and includes two iterative improvement loops, and introduces a new real‑world dataset, RE‑E2E, for evaluating RE workflows from elicitation to generation. The framework, along with two enhanced variants that use autonomous self‑refinement or structured human feedback, consistently outperforms baseline prompting methods across eight large language models, achieving higher text‑based metrics and superior human and LLM‑as‑a‑judge ratings.

By Yongjian Tang, Linhan Li, Thomas Runkler