arXiv:2607. 20519v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Looped Transformers increase test-time computation by repeatedly applying a shared recurrent block.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2607. 14427v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A depth-recurrent transformer applies a weight-tied core a variable number of times, and prior work has shown that training with a randomized recursion count yields one checkpoint usable across a range of inference depths.
The paper introduces CHASE, a cache‑hole‑adapted skip‑exit mechanism for looped state‑space language models, specifically Looped Mamba and Looped Hybrid Mamba‑Transformer. It shows that looping these architectures improves performance on controlled reasoning tasks and remains competitive in pre‑training benchmarks while using fewer distinct parameters. The cache‑hole adaptation allows selective skipping of recurrent steps during inference, maintaining perplexity close to full computation and achieving significant speedups.
The paper introduces LoopCD, a training‑free contrastive decoding framework that improves token selection in Loop‑Transformer models by comparing the final prediction with earlier recurrent passes. LoopCD operates either in logit space (LoopCD‑Logits) with a single extra output pass or in hidden‑state space (LoopCD‑Hidden) with no output overhead. Across multiple looped Transformer families, LoopCD yields significant performance gains—raising pass@1 scores on tasks such as AIME 2024 and HumanEval—while enabling a reduction in the number of recurrent loops and a corresponding decrease in inference FLOPs.
arXiv:2607. 10110v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent work on looped language models suggests that many reasoning problems benefit from greater computational depth rather than from additional independent parameters.
The paper critiques the common practice of evaluating depth usage in depth‑recurrent language models by truncating depth during inference and measuring performance decline. It argues that this method conflates three distinct effects—fewer block applications, reduced computation, and an out‑of‑distribution readout—yet is usually interpreted as measuring only the second. To address this, the authors introduce the Depth Control Protocol (DCP), a suite of positive and negative controls that isolate each factor, along with a training intervention to confirm causality, specifically tailored for depth‑wise weight‑sharing architectures.
The paper introduces LOOM, a method for scaling looped mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) Transformers beyond the typical two‑loop limit. LOOM addresses two key obstacles: it stabilizes deep recurrence by bounding residual variance and re‑injecting the input embedding, and it prevents expert selection collapse by using per‑loop routers and a looping residual to maintain computational diversity. Experiments on 100 M–1.7 B parameter models show stable scaling to 9–12 loops, with significant perplexity reductions and zero‑shot accuracy gains under near‑iso‑FLOP conditions.