About the Influence of Workflow Topology on Task Intensity Prediction through Graph Learning
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
GLOW is a framework that predicts the performance of Agentic Workflows by combining Graph Neural Networks with a graph-oriented Large Language Model. It extracts topology-aware semantic representations from workflow descriptions and fuses them with structural representations via a Transformer-based module, using contrastive learning to enhance discriminative power. Experiments on the FLORA-Bench benchmark show GLOW surpasses existing baselines in accuracy and ranking, and when used in the AFLOW generation system, it cuts optimization time by 98.7% with minimal loss in score.
arXiv:2606. 13513v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Driven by conservative over-provisioning to guarantee service reliability, resource utilization in cloud data centers remains at low levels.
arXiv:2606. 01162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Workflow scheduling in cloud computing demands the intelligent allocation of dynamically arriving, graph-structured workflows with varying deadlines onto ever-changing virtual machine resources.
arXiv:2607. 24773v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Managing cloud infrastructure efficiently, especially in environments of large cloud providers or hyperscalers, requires optimizing the use of physical resources to minimize costs and maximize performance.
arXiv:2609.14952v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dynamic cloud workflow scheduling must balance deadline satisfaction, container utilization, and energy consumption while dealing with stochastic task-...
The paper introduces agentic-eCAL, an extension of the Energy Cost of AI Lifecycle metric to evaluate multi‑agent AI workflows across the edge‑cloud continuum. By combining a two‑rate energy model with OSI‑layer transport analysis, the authors quantify that inter‑agent text transfer accounts for only 0.25% of total workflow energy, highlighting that the main energy cost lies in additional inference and context processing triggered by communication. The study uses extensive GPU benchmarks on NVIDIA A100/H100 with 16 open‑weight models and 8 orchestration topologies to validate the metric and explore placement implications.