arXiv AI By Yu Liu, Youxing Li, Yuedong Tan, Zhiwei Yang, Zihan Su, Hanqi Feng, Shaojie Zhang, Libin Liao, Zihao Wan, Chenxu Wu, Cong Cao, Fangfang Yuan, Yanbing Liu, Ziheng Chen, Pei Fu, Radu Timofte, Zongwei Wu, Nicu Sebe, Barnabas Poczos, Jian Luan

A-RSI: Adaptive Task Refresh for Zero-Data Multimodal Self-Improvement

Read the original on arXiv AI →

A-RSI is a method for zero‑data multimodal self‑improvement that separates the decision of when to refresh training experience from the generation of new tasks. It monitors reward variation and accuracy in training logs to trigger task pool refreshes without relying on validation or test scores. The approach uses a static library of model‑authored programs to generate multimodal questions and verify answers, achieving a performance increase from 57.77 to 61.05 on an eleven‑benchmark suite with 800 fresh tasks.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 26

RSI-Opt: Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents For Model Training

RSI-Opt introduces Recursive Self-Improvement Optimizer Agents that evolve their own training policies by accumulating knowledge from previous runs, including prompts, playbooks, optimizer code, and decision cadences. A meta‑agent rewrites and archives these policies, enabling reusable procedures and code that adapt to new tasks. Across multiple generations and tasks, RSI‑Opt improves optimizer performance, achieving higher z‑scores on evolution suites, better cross‑model transfer, and significant error reductions on PDE benchmarks compared to fixed‑prompt baselines.

By Binghang Lu, Yige Sun, Guang Lin
arXiv AI
Oct 27

RSI Arena: Towards Recursive Self-Improvement with Human Feedback

RSI Arena is a two‑stage experiment where ten large language models, each starting from NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B Base, autonomously train and refine themselves using human feedback. In the first six‑day stage, each agent receives 1,000 GPU‑hours and $300 in API credit to select data, design training procedures, and choose checkpoints, producing working assistants that close a median 76% of the base‑to‑Instruct gap on 12 benchmarks. The second stage gives agents access to comparison records and an additional three days of training, resulting in style‑adjusted relative rating improvements for eight of the ten models, though benchmark gains remain modest and some agents exhibit longer responses or increased harmful compliance.

By Yue Huang, Yanbo Wang, Lichi Li, Yuanyuan Chen, Andreas Haupt, Xiaonan Luo, Zheyuan Liu, Jihye Choi, Felix Juefei-Xu, Xiangliang Zhang, Radha Poovendran, Misha Sra, Ying Liu, Ben Burtenshaw, Thomas Wolf, Alex Pentland, Zichen Chen, Zhangchen Xu
arXiv AI
Oct 15

From Existing Methods to New Research Ideas: Two Perspectives on Recursive Self-Improvement

arXiv:2610.14625v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recursive self-improvement (RSI) offers a route to AI systems that participate in their own continued development. Recent methods allow language agents...

By Leijun Zhou, Yanke Yu, Zhihao Liu, Qu Xiang, Tiancheng Hu, Yiru Dong, Yihan Wu, Yangxi Xiang, Xuejun Wu, Xi Chen, Buyue Qian, Yaowei Zheng, Junhao Hu
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Self-Evolving Harness on Multiple Tasks with the Agent as Its Own Optimizer

The paper introduces a self‑evolving harness framework where a frozen language‑model agent first solves tasks and then edits its own harness based on run records. Using a 49‑line seed harness, the evolved harness improves average scores on in‑distribution benchmarks by 4.48 points and on out‑of‑distribution benchmarks by 12.64 points, surpassing Codex on the former and matching it on the latter. Continued evolution on a specific out‑of‑distribution benchmark further raises performance, and the study analyzes emergent mechanisms such as output truncation and history compaction.

By Qiankai Xu