← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Yalin Liu, Kosay Jabre, Rui Abreu, Zachariah J. Carmichael, Vijayaraghavan Murali, Akshay Patel, Jun Ge, Weiyan Sun, Cong Zhang, Audris Mockus, David Khavari, Peter C. Rigby, Nachiappan Nagappan

A Preliminary Study on Explaining Risk of Code Changes using LLM-Based Prediction Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 02782v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Predictions by machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) models are often received skeptically unless they are paired with intelligible explanations.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Aug 28

From Static to Dynamic: Benchmarking Real-World Code Review with MCR-Bench

The paper introduces MCR-Bench, a benchmark for realistic multi‑round code review that includes 2,269 real‑world tasks across five programming languages, each annotated with fine‑grained defect information and dynamic state labels. Experiments with mainstream large language models show limited overall performance, especially as interaction rounds increase, and reveal that model accuracy varies by defect type and severity. Error analysis identifies key failure mechanisms such as cross‑round temporal misalignment and insufficient long‑range memory.

By Dewu Zheng, Yanlin Wang, Xiwen Wang, Kefeng Duan, Hongyu Zhang, Xilin Liu, Yuchi Ma, Zibin Zheng
llmsbenchmarks
More like this →