arXiv Machine Learning By Jethro Odeyemi, W. J. Zhang

A Montage-Agnostic Encoder for Calibration-Light Cross-User Gesture Recognition from Surface Electromyography

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 27565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pattern-recognition control promises a myoelectric prosthesis that responds to many intended gestures rather than one or two, but the promise has stayed in the laboratory.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 30

A Montage-Agnostic Encoder for Calibration-Light Cross-User Gesture Recognition from Surface Electromyography

Pattern-recognition control promises a myoelectric prosthesis that responds to many intended gestures rather than one or two, but the promise has stayed in the laboratory. A recogniser trained on one person rarely transfers to the next, and useful performance usually demands a fresh round of labelled calibration from the end user.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Personalising a Cross-User Surface Electromyography Encoder Under a Small Calibration Budget

The paper investigates how to personalize a cross-user surface electromyography (sEMG) encoder when only a few calibration repetitions are available. Four methods—prototypical adaptation, linear probes, scaled fine‑tuning, and full fine‑tuning—were evaluated across 77 subjects on two databases. Full fine‑tuning consistently achieved the highest accuracy, but a gradient‑free prototypical rule captured 52–78 % of the benefit without per‑user weight copies, enabling quick donning‑time personalization.

By Jethro Odeyemi, W. J. Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Intact-to-Amputee Transfer in Surface-EMG Gesture Decoding: Training Source and Calibration Budget

The study evaluates how well a surface‑EMG gesture recogniser trained on intact‑limb data transfers to transradial amputees. Zero‑shot transfer fails; the model needs a few labelled repetitions from the new user to outperform a per‑user classifier, achieving a macro‑F1 of 0.779 versus 0.589. Training on a larger pool of intact subjects, or combining intact and amputee data, yields the best cross‑population performance.

By Jethro Odeyemi, W. J. Zhang