arXiv Statistics ML By Alessio Basti, Fabio Camilli, Adriano Festa

A Mean Field Games Perspective on Evolutionary Clustering

Read the original on arXiv Statistics ML →

The paper introduces a control‑theoretic framework for evolutionary clustering using quasi‑stationary Mean Field Games. Each cluster is modeled as a probability density whose dynamics follow a Fokker–Planck equation, while a stationary Hamilton–Jacobi equation determines the velocity field. In a Gaussian specialization, affine dynamics replicate the mean and covariance trajectories of the classical Expectation–Maximization algorithm, and the authors propose causal and non‑causal time‑averaged log‑likelihood objectives to enhance temporal coherence, along with a fully density‑based numerical implementation for non‑Gaussian components. The method is evaluated on synthetic and real time‑dependent datasets, compared to snapshot Expectation–Maximization, temporally smoothed observations, and an evolutionary k‑means baseline.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Statistics ML.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3

Local exponential stability of mean-field Langevin descent-ascent and associated particle system

arXiv:2602. 01564v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the mean-field Langevin descent-ascent (MFL-DA), a coupled optimization dynamics on the space of probability measures for entropically regularized two-player zero-sum games, together with its associated interacting particle system.

By Geuntaek Seo, Minseop Shin, Pierre Monmarch\'e, Beomjun Choi
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Federated Soft Clustering via Generalized Total Variation Minimization

The paper introduces federated soft clustering for devices in a federated learning network, each fitting a personalized Gaussian mixture model. It proposes Generalized Total Variation Minimization (GTVMin) to couple local maximum likelihood problems via a graph regularizer that penalizes discrepancies between connected nodes’ models. Three discrepancy measures are compared: a squared Euclidean distance requiring component matching, a Monte‑Carlo approximated Kullback‑Leibler divergence, and a closed‑form maximum mean discrepancy; all are optimized with synchronous projected gradient updates, with a convergence guarantee for the smooth MMD instance.

By Shamsiiat Abdurakhmanova, Alexander Jung