arXiv:2607. 17242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pretrained machine learning (ML) models help developers build ML-intensive software systems without training models from scratch.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 11022v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model Cards and Data Cards have demonstrated the value of structured, human-readable documentation for machine learning artifacts, capturing their context, parameters, limitations, and intended use.
arXiv:2607. 26652v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) systems requires rigorous documentation of their constituent artifacts, e.
arXiv:2607. 17883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Enterprises will not deploy AI agents they cannot trust, and the most-cited reason for distrust is hallucination: confident, fluent output that is simply not true.
arXiv:2604. 10311v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, encompassing both traditional machine learning (ML) and more advanced approaches such as deep learning and large language models (LLMs), play a central role in modern applications.
arXiv:2609.15369v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Word-level detectors identify unedited AI-generated text almost perfectly, but the literature documents their brittleness under rewording, and a word-l...
The paper introduces a six‑stage audit framework for assessing reproducibility in computer science literature and applies it to the neuro‑symbolic AI (NSAI) subfield. Using the framework, the authors screened 5,497 records, identified 1,304 eligible studies, and found verifiable code artifacts for only 455 of them. Of those, they fully or partially reproduced 85 studies, representing 6.52% of the eligible corpus and 18.68% of attempted reruns, highlighting a significant reproducibility gap even when code is declared available.