arXiv Computation and Language
A Cross Community Agenda for Speech AI
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 1
Is Natural Always Appropriate? Investigating Naturalness and Appropriateness Across Different Domains for TTS Evaluation
arXiv:2606. 31729v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-speech (TTS) evaluation is an open challenge.
arXiv AI
Jun 24
It's Complicated: On the Design and Evaluation of AI-Powered AAC Interfaces
arXiv:2606. 24854v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance what people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) are able to do with their systems.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
Human or Machine? A Preliminary Turing Test for Speech-to-Speech Interaction
The paper reports the first Turing test for speech‑to‑speech systems, gathering 2,968 human judgments on conversations between nine state‑of‑the‑art S2S systems and 28 humans. None of the evaluated systems passed the test, highlighting a clear gap in human‑likeness. The authors diagnose the failure with an 18‑dimension taxonomy, finding that paralinguistic cues, emotional expressivity, and conversational persona—not semantic understanding—are the main bottlenecks, and they propose an interpretable model for automatic human‑vs‑machine discrimination.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 28
IndicTalk: A Large-Scale Persona-Based Multilingual Conversational Corpus for Indic Languages
arXiv:2607. 23242v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed conversational AI, yet high-quality multilingual code-mixed dialogue resources remain scarce, particularly for Indic languages where speakers naturally alternate between English and their native language in both native-script and Romanized forms.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
RW-Voice-EQ Bench: A Real World Benchmark for Evaluating Voice AI Systems
arXiv:2607. 14846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual representation.
arXiv AI
2d ago
MASCOT: Multi-Agent Socio-Collaborative Companion Systems
arXiv:2601.14230v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-agent systems (MAS) are emerging as promising socio-collaborative companions for emotional and cognitive support. However, existing sys...