arXiv AI By Vagner Figueredo de Santana, Diogo Cortiz

A Baseline Assessment for the Agentic Web Technology Stack

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces MASTIF, a Multi‑Agent System TestIng Framework, to evaluate how different protocols, frameworks, and libraries combine into an Agentic Web solution. It presents a baseline assessment using 3 large language models, 3 protocols, and 4 agent implementation frameworks across 300 Mind2Web benchmark tasks. The results show that task‑specific technology stacks can improve completion rates, efficiency, and social value stability while reducing verbosity and task time.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Jun 8

SW-$A^2$-Bench: Benchmarking Autonomous Software Agent Generation for Agentic Web

arXiv:2604. 04226v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Agentic Web is emerging as a paradigm in which autonomous software agents interact with online resources and with each other to accomplish user goals.

By Linyao Chen, Bo Huang, Qinlao Zhao, Shuai Shao, Zhi Han, Zicai Cui, Ziheng Zhang, Guangtao Zeng, Wenzheng Tang, Yikun Wang, Yuanjian Zhou, Zimian Peng, Yong Yu, Weiwen Liu, Hiroki Kobayashi, Weinan Zhang
arXiv AI
Sep 12

Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks

The article "Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks" surveys the lack of a standard definition for AI agents and organizes this ambiguity into five dimensions: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal‑directed behavior, and temporal coherence. It reviews how each dimension has been conceptualized in prior work and compiles the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess them. The authors also introduce the Agent Compendium, a public digital resource that extends these evaluation methods, aiming to provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems.

By Mia Lassiter, Brinnae Bent
arXiv AI
Jul 16

AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities

arXiv:2607. 13705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical.

By Zichen Ding, Jiaye Ge, Shufan Jiang, Kai Chen, Mo Li, Qingqiu Li, Zehao Li, Zonglin Li, Tiaohao Liang, Shudong Liu, Zerun Ma, Zixing Shang, Wenhui Tian, Zun Wang, Liwei Wu, Zhenyu Wu, Jun Xu, Bowen Yang, Dingbo Yuan, Qi Zhang, Songyang Zhang, Peiheng Zhou, Dongsheng Zhu
arXiv AI
Jun 12

AgentBeats: Agentifying Agent Assessment for Openness, Standardization, and Reproducibility

arXiv:2606. 13608v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented.

By Xiaoyuan Liu, Jianhong Tu, Yuqi Chen, Siyuan Xie, Sihan Ren, Tianneng Shi, Gal Gantar, Evan Sandoval, Donghyun Lee, Daniel Miao, Peter J. Gilbert, Nick Hynes, Mauro Staver, Warren He, David Marn, Andrew Low, Xi Zhang, Elron Bandel, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Siva Reddy, Alexandre Drouin, Alexandre Lacoste, Ramayya Krishnan, Elham Tabassi, Yu Su, Victor Barres, Chenguang Wang, Wenbo Guo, Dawn Song
arXiv AI
Jun 10

How can we assess human-agent interactions? Case studies in software agent design

arXiv:2510. 09801v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While benchmarks measure the accuracy of LLM-powered agents, they mostly assume full automation, failing to represent the collaborative nature of real-world use cases.

By Valerie Chen, Rohit Malhotra, Xingyao Wang, Juan Michelini, Xuhui Zhou, Aditya Bharat Soni, Hoang H. Tran, Calvin Smith, Ameet Talwalkar, Graham Neubig