The paper reports a reproducible GPU power benchmark for 18 open‑source LLMs (0.5B–7B parameters) run on a single consumer RTX 4060ti GPU using the Ollama inference engine. Energy metrics such as mean/peak power, total energy per prompt, energy per output token, and throughput were measured, revealing that model architecture and quantization strategy, rather than parameter count alone, drive energy efficiency. The most efficient models were qwen2.5:0.5b and tinyllama:1.1b, while the 7B‑Mistral model consumed up to 8.6× more energy per token, and qwen3.5:0.8b(on) showed unusually high per‑prompt energy due to extended internal reasoning.
By Philipp M. Z\"ahl, Elja Dalipaj, Anika Hennig, Timon Bayer
Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption. Optimizing these deployments requires matching specific LLMs to the most efficient GPUs, but operators currently lack the tools to do so without exhaustively profiling each combination.
arXiv:2608.28044v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large language model (LLM) inference serving is priced by tokens, but GPU energy is consumed over inference windows. This accounting mismatch makes t...
By Prabhu Vellaisamy, Vanessa Lam, Shawn Blanton, John Paul Shen
arXiv:2607. 02391v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption.
By Mauricio Fadel Argerich, Jonathan F\"urst, Marta Pati\~no-Mart\'inez
The operational energy consumption of large language model (LLM) inference is becoming an increasingly important component of the environmental footprint of deployed AI systems. However, direct measurement of inference energy often requires hardware telemetry, power instrumentation, or infrastructure-specific monitoring, limiting its applicability in comparative studies, early-stage system design, and sustainability reporting.
The paper investigates the energy costs of multilingual large language model (LLM) inference, revealing significant disparities across languages. Using the ML.Energy framework, the authors find that energy consumption per output token can differ by up to 8.3×, and total energy for a fixed request set can vary up to 179×, with English being the cheapest and Pashto the most expensive. The study attributes these differences to higher per-token costs for complex or rare scripts and longer outputs for low‑resource languages, and notes that high‑energy languages also tend to have lower task accuracy.
By Naihao Deng, Alissa Shen, Yiming Feng, Joan Nwatu, Jae-Won Chung, Mosharaf Chowdhury, Yulong Chen, Rada Mihalcea
arXiv:2607. 26571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The operational energy consumption of large language model (LLM) inference is becoming an increasingly important component of the environmental footprint of deployed AI systems.
By Tina Vartziotis, Rodopi Kosteli, Elli Vartziotis, George Dasoulas, Michael Keckeisen, Konstantinos Skianis, Sotirios Kotsopoulos, Francesca Dominici
The paper compares two strategies for handling memory limits in large language model (LLM) serving: tensor parallelism, which distributes weights and KV cache across multiple GPUs, and KV compression, which reduces cache size via quantisation and eviction on a single GPU. Using a cost‑normalised simulator calibrated on A100, A40, and H100 hardware, the authors find that across two models (Llama‑2 7B and 70B) and various GPU configurations, compression consistently outperforms tensor parallelism in cost per million tokens, offering 1.20× to 2.00× savings. The study identifies a model‑size threshold (~36B parameters on an 80 GB card) where compression dominates, while tensor parallelism becomes necessary only for larger models where weights alone exceed a single GPU’s capacity.
By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Mehar Simhadri, Anshu Bansal, Jay Iyer, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly, Raj Dandekar
arXiv:2608.28667v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) has raised concerns about their environmental impact during inference. While Green AI researc...
By Rajeswari Kannan, Raj Firke, Shreya Bengle, Srushti Deshmukh
The paper systematically studies decode‑phase energy consumption of open‑source large language models using different attention architectures—Multi‑Head Attention (MHA), Grouped Query Attention (GQA), and GQA with Sliding Window Attention (SWA). It evaluates four models across varying context lengths, batch sizes, and generation workloads, measuring GPU energy via NVIDIA counters. Findings show that the attention mechanism is the main driver of how energy scales with context length, with MHA models growing steeply, GQA models growing less, and GQA+SWA remaining nearly constant; model size mainly sets absolute energy use, while batching can cut energy per token and latency by up to 87%.
By Molka Chkir, Syed Muhammad Danish, Jos H\"oll, Arghavan Asad
TokenPowerSandbox is an evidence‑gated workflow that uses a CPU‑resident projector, brief GPU probes, full‑workload verification, and tamper‑evident provenance to predict energy usage of large language model serving. In experiments on an NVIDIA H100 80GB running Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct with vLLM, the method achieved energy MAPE of 6.23% and 7.35% on blind holdout and no‑refit confirmations, with high Spearman rank correlations. A predeclared TTFT gate demonstrated that energy accuracy alone cannot guarantee latency, as it passed at concurrency four but abstained below that level.
By Chenxu Niu
arXiv:2601. 06649v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Research in machine learning has questioned whether increases in training token counts reliably produce proportional performance gains in large language models.
By Joe Dwyer