arXiv:2608. 18607v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Using reinforcement learning to post-train joint video-audio generation models requires a reward signal.
SpeechCritic learns a diagnostic speech judge from only about 300 human-labeled comparisons, calibrating a frontier audio-language model with non-binding hints that select acoustic measurements agreeing with human judgments. The approach improves dimension-level agreement by 6.3 points and reduces mismatch in Tie rates by 10.4 points, and training a 7B judge with SFT, OPD, and RL yields distinct behaviors, with RL producing more specific rationales. The method works across language pairs, demonstrating a path from limited human preferences to a diagnostic speech judge.
arXiv:2608.31035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Codec-based text-to-speech (TTS) models make language-model post-training applicable to speech generation, but it remains unclear when learned perceptu...
arXiv:2609.13150v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reference-free quality predictors such as UTMOS, DNSMOS and SCOREQ are the de facto automatic evaluators for text-to-speech (TTS) and are increasingl...
arXiv:2509. 14659v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current audio captioning relies on supervised learning with paired audio-caption data, which is costly to curate and may not reflect human preferences in real-world scenarios.
arXiv:2606.28249v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recently, Large Language Model (LLM)-based Text-to-Speech (TTS) models have achieved remarkable naturalness. However, the standard Supervised...
arXiv:2603. 00610v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While music generation models have evolved to handle complex multimodal inputs mixing text, lyrics, and reference audio, evaluation mechanisms have lagged behind.
arXiv:2608. 09930v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Models (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive.
arXiv:2610.14776v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-speech (TTS) systems are conventionally optimized for intelligibility and speaker similarity. However, neither objective captures the prosodi...
The paper introduces a reproducible framework that converts existing text-based tool‑calling benchmarks into audio‑based evaluations using text‑to‑speech, speaker variation, and environmental noise, while preserving original annotations. Experiments on seven omni‑modal models show that performance varies strongly by model and task, with notable gaps between text and voice results. The study also includes a stress test, a reference‑free LLM‑as‑judge protocol, and demonstrates that open‑source judges can match proprietary ones, aiding privacy‑preserving evaluation.
arXiv:2607. 13408v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent text-to-audio models generate high-quality audio, but often fail to follow instructions involving multiple sound events and temporal order.
arXiv:2607. 06611v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatically recognizing the sentiment, positive or negative, from speech is a challenging task, requiring both the analysis of vocal inflections and the interpretation of uttered words.