arXiv Computation and Language

Investigating Temporal Motion Features for Pose-to-Text Indian Sign Language Translation

arXiv AI
Jul 7

ViPo-MLLM: Visual-Pose Multimodal LLM for Gloss-Free Sign Language Translation

arXiv:2607. 03657v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gloss-free Sign Language Translation (SLT) translates sign language videos into spoken-language sentences without gloss annotations, avoiding costly labeling but requiring fine-grained modeling of hands, body, and facial cues.

By Ahmed Abul Hasanaath, Bicheng Xu, Mir Rayat Imtiaz Hossain, Leonid Sigal, Hamzah Luqman
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

Attention-Steered Vision-Language Models for Sign Language Translation

The paper introduces AttnSign, a vision‑language model that improves sign language translation by steering spatial‑temporal attention. It first supervises attention on sign‑relevant regions such as faces and hands in each frame, then uses an RL‑based motion‑cadence method to focus on keyframes. Experiments on How2Sign and OpenASL show AttnSign consistently outperforms existing methods.

By Meibo Hu, Guohao Sun, Annemarie D. Ross, Sheng Li, Zhiqiang Tao
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 15

SignMimic: Robust High-Quality Sign Language Motion Generation via Human-Shape-Oblivious Pose Transfer Guidance

arXiv:2609.14122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the challenge of sign language video mimicking: given a driving video and a single reference frame, synthesize a video where the target signer...

By Zhewen He (New York University Abu Dhabi), Junyi Yu (New York University Abu Dhabi), Haomian Huang (New York University Abu Dhabi), Zhenhua Li (ChatSign Technology), Yi Fang (New York University Abu Dhabi, ChatSign Technology)
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

SMART: MLLM-guided Temporal Alignment for Unifying Sign Language Recognition and Spotting

SMART is a new framework that jointly tackles continuous sign language recognition (CSLR) and spotting by leveraging a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to generate motion descriptions as auxiliary semantic cues. It performs stable video‑text alignment with small batch sizes and introduces a Multi‑Scale Temporal Adapter to capture temporal interactions during transformer encoding. The framework also incorporates CSFormer, a CSLR‑guided spotting module that injects recognition‑derived gloss evidence into a boundary‑aware spotting network, enabling mutual benefit between recognition and spotting tasks.

By Eunjee Choi, JungHoon Sung, Seongwhan Cho, Chu Xin, Younggeun Choi
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

SignGPT: Toward LLM-Mediated Sign Language Interaction through Gloss-Free Translation and Generation

SignGPT is a unified, pose‑based framework that performs gloss‑free sign language translation (SLT) and generation (SLG) by integrating part‑aware hierarchical representations of body, hand, and facial motion into a shared language model. It uses asymmetric multi‑token prediction and progressive training for bidirectional modeling, and is evaluated on How2Sign (ASL) and Phoenix‑2014T (DGS) with benchmark comparisons, qualitative analyses, and component ablations. An exploratory study with 12 Deaf ASL signers demonstrates a sign‑to‑sign response pipeline, suggesting that unified modeling can support sign language conversation (SLC).

By Ronghui Li, Jun Dong, Zhongyuan Hu, Zunnan Xu, Jun Zhou, Liyuan Chen, Shuoling Liu, Jiangpeng Yan, Jie Guo, Xiu Li, Linchao Bao
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Beyond BLEU: A Case for Redefining Sign Language Translation Benchmarks

The paper argues that BLEU-4, the prevailing metric for sign language translation (SLT), may not accurately reflect sign language proficiency because SLT models can exploit spurious correlations and spoken-language priors. By evaluating six SLT models on Phoenix-2014T and CSL-Daily, the authors show that higher BLEU-4 scores do not necessarily indicate better spatio-temporal understanding. They propose a new open-weight LLM QA protocol inspired by language-learning assessment, which better preserves salient content, aligns more closely with human rankings, and reveals differences between gloss-free and gloss-supervised systems that BLEU-4 obscures.

By Oline Ranum, Edward Fish, Simon Hadfield, Richard Bowden