arXiv AI

Absorbed in Inertia: Activation Analysis for Computer-Use Agents

The paper investigates a phenomenon called inertia in computer‑use agents, where agents repeat ineffective actions despite recognizing their futility. By analyzing high‑dimensional activation states, the authors find that inertia corresponds to an absorbing region in activation space where values become stale. They propose a method called R$^3$—Reset, Reroute, Restore—to temporarily reset the agent’s context trajectory, escape the absorbing region, and then restore historical context, achieving a 17‑55% reduction in measured inertia across models.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Understanding and Exploiting Initialization Anchoring Weakness in Feedback-Based Agent Planning

The paper investigates a vulnerability in feedback‑based agent planning, showing that the first round of feedback corrects a large portion of adversarial directions (46%) while subsequent rounds see a sharp decline (13% and 7%). The authors attribute this to an initialization anchoring weakness driven by plausible plan shifts, lack of counterevidence, and persistence of accepted directions. They introduce “InitAnchor”, a black‑box attack framework that exploits these factors, achieving high attack success rates across diverse tasks, architectures, and LLMs, and remaining effective against multiple defenses and real‑world agents.

By Chuanchao Zang, Jianing Wang, Wenyu Chen, Xiangtao Meng, Li Wang, Xinyu Gao, Peng Zhan, Zheng Li, Shanqing Guo
arXiv AI
Jul 14

AgentAbstain: Do LLM Agents Know When Not to Act?

arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.

By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran