arXiv Machine Learning

GUPO: Gradient Uncertainty-aware Policy Optimization for Post-Training Large Language Models

GUPO: Gradient Uncertainty-aware Policy Optimization for Post-Training Large Language Models proposes a new method for fine‑tuning LLMs after training. The approach models each group gradient as a random variable, estimates its probability distribution, and uses Dirichlet‑based gradient uncertainty to weight each group’s contribution during policy updates. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that this uncertainty‑aware aggregation improves the effectiveness of post‑training policy optimization.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

ConSteer-RL: Steering Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models via Confidence-Aware Reinforcement Learning

arXiv:2606. 08088v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has recently become a key paradigm for improving the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it remains limited by sparse binary rewards and its ignorance of model-internal uncertainty.

By Qing Miao, Yiming Zhao, Jing Yang, Chenxi Liu, Yuehai Chen, Yuewen Liu, Shaoyi Du, Badong Chen
arXiv AI
Jun 30

BV-Blend: Uncertainty-Weighted Historical Baselines for Stable Critic-Free RL with Verifiable Rewards

arXiv:2606. 28707v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Critic-free reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR), exemplified by Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), avoids training a value function (critic) and reduces memory and compute overhead relative to critic-based PPO pipelines for aligning large language models.

By Yupeng Chang, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Consensus Group Relative Policy Optimization for Text Generation

Consensus Group Relative Policy Optimization (C‑GRPO) is a new training method that distills Minimum Bayes Risk (MBR) decoding into a group‑relative objective, enabling text generation models to approximate MBR performance without the costly inference‑time sampling and scoring. C‑GRPO only needs a utility function and policy samples, avoiding the need for gold references or curated preference data. Experiments on WMT 2024 machine translation and XSum summarization show that C‑GRPO matches MBR decoding quality while reducing inference overhead and outperforming other reference‑free baselines.

By Yuki Ichihara, Yuu Jinnai, Kaito Ariu, Eiji Uchibe
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

BiasGRPO: Stabilizing Bias Mitigation in High-Variance Reward Landscapes via Group-Relative Policy Optimization

Mitigating social bias in Large Language Models (LLMs) presents a distinct alignment challenge: unlike verifiable tasks, bias lacks a single ground truth, creating a high-variance, subjective reward landscape. Previous preference-based fine-tuning methods have major trade-offs: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) is limited by the lack of exploration inherent in offline training, while Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) can lead to training instability due to potentially unreliable critic estimates.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Advantage Collapse in Group Relative Policy Optimization: Diagnosis and Mitigation

arXiv:2605. 21125v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a prominent algorithm within the Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) framework, has achieved strong results in improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs).

By Xixiang He, Qiyao Sun, Ao Cheng, Xingming Li, Xuanyu Ji, Hailun Lu, Runke Huang, Qingyong Hu