Factorizable joint shift revisited
arXiv:2601. 15036v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Factorizable joint shift (FJS) represents a type of distribution shift (or dataset shift) that comprises both covariate and label shift.
arXiv:2609. 11918v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization under distribution shift remains a core challenge in modern machine learning, yet existing learning bound theory is limited to narrow, idealized settings and is non-estimable from samples.
arXiv:2601. 15036v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Factorizable joint shift (FJS) represents a type of distribution shift (or dataset shift) that comprises both covariate and label shift.
arXiv:2608. 13133v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Distributional shifts arise when the target deployment environment differs from the source environment that generated the training data.
The paper investigates weighted empirical risk minimization under nonstationary data, decomposing the excess risk into a learning component and a drift component. It establishes oracle inequalities for the learning error under mixing conditions, uniformly over arbitrary weight classes, and derives explicit bounds for drift errors in square loss settings, covering structural‑break and smoothly drifting processes. The analysis is extended to auto‑regression problems with linear models, basis approximations, and neural networks, revealing that optimal weights balance learning and drift via a bias–variance trade‑off and recover minimax‑optimal rates in unweighted, stationary cases.
arXiv:2408.16189v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transfer learning, in regression or classification, concerns problems where one aims to use imperfect data from a source distribution P to im...
arXiv:2608. 00701v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reweighting source samples to match a target covariate distribution is a standard response to distribution shift when generalizing evidence from one population to another.
arXiv:2607. 11947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Typical semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods rely on distributional assumptions, and their performance degrades when these are violated.
arXiv:2303. 08777v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Cross-validation is one of the most widely used tools for risk estimation and model selection in statistics and machine learning, yet its theoretical properties when embedded in a learning procedure remain insufficiently understood.
arXiv:2608. 06250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In overparameterised classification, training data can be linearly separable even when the underlying distribution is not.
arXiv:2607. 20309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Covariate shift often occurs because, in many real applications, the source and the target observations may be generated from different distributions.
arXiv:2610.01028v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning models often suffer performance degradation under subpopulation shift, particularly when spurious correlations cause models to rely...
arXiv:2606. 14506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding how a prediction model will perform in a new environment before deployment is essential to preventing harm when algorithms inform decision-making.
arXiv:2505. 16713v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We examine the concentration of uniform generalization errors around their expectation in binary linear classification problems via an isoperimetric argument.