arXiv:2608. 09042v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large traveling salesman problem (TSP) instances require a solver to allocate limited computation while preserving the validity of its outputs.
By Yancheng Song, Yongzhi Qi, Wei Qi, Zuo-Jun Max Shen
arXiv:2607. 18632v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated Algorithm Selection (AS) aims to improve problem-solving performance by selecting, for each problem instance, the most suitable algorithm from a predefined portfolio.
By Zhaoxuan Li, Jiale Yang, Yifei Lu, Mustafa Misir
arXiv:2606. 22776v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Non-autoregressive neural solvers amortize computation across traveling salesman problem (TSP) instances, but models trained on random Euclidean instances can degrade when the number or spatial distribution of nodes changes.
By Xiang Li
arXiv:2605. 01928v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We optimize losses that jump: spiking thresholds, quantized layers, and discrete routing put jumps in the forward pass, where backpropagation does not apply.
By An T. Le
Automated Algorithm Selection (AS) aims to improve problem-solving performance by selecting, for each problem instance, the most suitable algorithm from a predefined portfolio. This is particularly relevant to the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP), where solver performance is strongly instance-dependent.
arXiv:2607. 12127v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning-based methods for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) are often evaluated through the tours produced after decoding or search, but the learned object itself frequently lives in a surrogate space such as heatmaps, assignments, construction policies, or search-guidance scores.
By Ke Sun, Xinyuan Zhang, Xinwu Qian
arXiv:2607. 13373v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Column generation (CG) is central to many large-scale optimization algorithms, including branch-price-and-cut methods for vehicle routing problems, but unstable dual solutions can substantially slow its convergence.
By Zhengzhong Ricky You, Bo Tang, Haoran Liu, Baichuan Mo
The paper introduces Network Feasibility Geometry Reinforcement Learning (NFG‑RL), a method that enforces multi‑layer network constraints—such as interference, power‑rate coupling, flow conservation, service chains, capacity, latency, and reliability—by transporting a proto‑policy through a differentiable feasibility map. By compiling heterogeneous constraints into typed residual blocks and using a variational transport operator, NFG‑RL ensures almost‑sure feasible execution and shapes exploration and gradients to respect active constraints. Experiments on two wireless‑edge surrogate environments show that NFG‑RL boosts feasible utility by 37.5–41.5 %, cuts raw‑action violations by 48.5–60.8 %, and reduces P99 delay by 57.0–75.5 % compared to leading baselines.
By Zuyuan Zhang, Zeyu Fang, Mahdi Imani, Nathaniel D. Bastian, Tian Lan
arXiv:2606. 29252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study repeated bidding in multi-unit discriminatory (pay-as-bid) auctions for a single bidder with per-round utility equal to value minus $\alpha$ times payment, where $\alpha\in[0,1]$ is a cost-of-capital parameter.
By Negin Golrezaei, Sourav Sahoo
arXiv:2607. 16891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A truckload carrier must accept or reject each load tender within seconds.
By Aswin Chandrasekaran
arXiv:2609. 30556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study dynamic regret in online convex optimization with an \emph{indicator switching cost}: a fixed penalty incurred whenever two consecutive decisions differ.
By Naram Mhaisen, George Iosifidis
arXiv:2609.24489v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Offline reinforcement learning (RL) typically trains a critic by minimizing a regression loss against bootstrapped value targets stabilized by target n...
By Hyukjun Yang, Jongchan Park, Narim Jeong, Donghwan Lee