Reinforcement learning can align diffusion models with human preferences and task-specific objectives, but endpoint rewards do not specify how an intermediate denoising prediction should change. We in...
arXiv:2602. 07339v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion-based trajectory planners can model multi-modal driving behavior, but their iterative denoising process introduces a latency bottleneck for real-time closed-loop deployment.
By Ruturaj Reddy, Hrishav Bakul Barua, Junn Yong Loo, Thanh Thi Nguyen, Ganesh Krishnasamy
arXiv:2608. 03929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning diffusion models with human preferences usually relies on a sparse terminal reward evaluated on the final generated samples, presenting a severe temporal credit-assignment challenge across the multi-step denoising process.
By Yuanshen Guan, Zipeng Feng, Zhiwei Xiong, Peiqin Sun
Diffusion models have strong generative capabilities. However, their maximum likelihood training objective only focuses on reconstructing the data distribution, making it difficult to align with specific preferences.
arXiv:2608.23664v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Reward fine-tuning is becoming an important tool for adapting diffusion models to human preferences and task-specific objectives, but existing method...
By Jaemoo Choi, Wei Guo, Yuchen Zhu, Arash Vahdat, Molei Tao, Julius Berner, Yongxin Chen
The paper introduces GRAS, a method that improves training‑free reward alignment for discrete diffusion models by reducing variance in guided proposals and adapting the resampling temperature during search. It achieves this without adding denoiser cost, using Rao‑Blackwellized estimates for differentiable rewards and a leave‑one‑out baseline for non‑differentiable ones. Experiments on regulatory DNA and protein design show GRAS outperforms existing training‑free techniques and rivals reward‑fine‑tuned models.
By Kwanyoung Kim
arXiv:2607. 07693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for aligning generative models with human preferences.
By Eric Zhu, Abhinav Shrivastava, Soumik Mukhopadhyay
Efficient text-to-image generation requires both reinforcement-learning (RL)-based reward alignment and few-step distillation, yet these procedures are typically performed sequentially, increasing training cost and risking the loss of reward gains during compression. We instead take an RL-native perspective: diffusion RL already generates reward-scored finite-step trajectories, whose intermediate states provide a natural source of distillation supervision rather than a disposable byproduct of sampling.
arXiv:2606. 30414v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Distillation and Reinforcement Learning (RL) fine-tuning are the primary pillars of diffusion post-training.
By Alexis Jacq, Guillaume Couairon, Valentin De Bortoli, Quentin Berthet, Arnaud Doucet, Romuald Elie
arXiv:2606. 15048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion models are typically trained with objectives that focus on local denoising targets at individual time steps (or adjacent pairs), which do not enforce consistency between predictions along the denoising trajectory.
By Qizhen Ying, Yangchen Pan, Victor Adrian Prisacariu, Junfeng Wen
arXiv:2608. 09226v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Efficient text-to-image generation requires both reinforcement-learning (RL)-based reward alignment and few-step distillation, yet these procedures are typically performed sequentially, increasing training cost and risking the loss of reward gains during compression.
By Yuhan Li, Fangao Zeng, Sicong Kang, Mengfei Xu, Hao Zhou, Wei Li, Pipei Huang, Bingbing Ni
arXiv:2609.02036v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Few-step diffusion models substantially compress temporal computation, making the spatial cost of each model evaluation an increasingly dominant source...
By Tingyan Wen, Chenqian Yan, Xurui Peng, Xiazhang Fang, Shuai Wang, Xueqian Wang, Songwei Liu