arXiv:2607.00711v2 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Large Language Models have emerged as programming assistants. However, the efficacy of code generation is constrained by the quality of input require...
By Zheng Fang, Dongming Jin, Yihong dong, Yongmin Li, Kechi Zhang, Zhi Jin, Ge Li
arXiv:2607. 04436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural language requirements (NLRs) are essential for bridging communication gaps among diverse stakeholders in software development.
By Pavithra PM Nair, Preethu Rose Anish
The paper introduces ReqClarifyBench, an interactive benchmark for evaluating how well large language models (LLMs) can clarify vague user intent into clear requirements in repository-level software development. It includes 341 tasks across game, miniapp, and web development, each with a vague intent, a human-validated requirement document, and code evaluation artifacts, and uses LLM-based user simulators with diverse personas. The study evaluates six LLMs on clarification effectiveness and requirement quality, finding that stronger clarification does not always yield better documents, performance varies by persona, and coding-agent harnesses do not improve document quality over base LLMs.
By Mingyu Chen, Zhiqing Zhong, Manyi Wang, Linxi Liang, Rouyu Chen, Pinjia He
arXiv:2602. 22456v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Requirements are inherently interconnected through various types of dependencies.
By Ikram Darif, Feifei Niu, Manel Abdellatif, Lionel C. Briand, Ramesh S., Arun Adiththan
The paper introduces a leakage‑aware framework for conversational task disambiguation over tabular data, defining ambiguous verifiable tasks and separating the agent into an asking policy and a solution policy. It presents AmbiTab, a benchmark suite that unifies six ambiguous datasets under a common representation, enabling evaluation of clarification strategies and oracle leakage. The authors train an asking policy with reinforcement learning, achieving improved disambiguation metrics across all datasets and higher task success on five of them, while providing diagnostics to measure oracle leakage during training.
By Nafiseh Ghoroghchian, Luis Scoccola, Tina Sedaghat, Omid Vaheb, Hannah Chen, Dino D'Agostino, Keyvan Golestan
HoarePrompt is a new method that applies program verification concepts to natural language requirements, using large language models to generate step‑by‑step natural language descriptions of program states. It incorporates a few‑shot k‑induction technique to handle loops and then evaluates whether the annotated program satisfies the requirements. On the CoCoClaNeL dataset, HoarePrompt raises the Matthews correlation coefficient by 61% over zero‑shot chain‑of‑thought prompts and by 106% over test‑generation classifiers, with the inductive reasoning component adding a 26% MCC improvement.
By Dimitrios Stamatios Bouras, Yihan Dai, Tairan Wang, Yingfei Xiong, Sergey Mechtaev
arXiv:2606. 17164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Prompting has become the primary interface between humans and generative AI, yet many natural language prompts remain fragile: roles, goals, constraints, and expected outputs are often buried in prose or left implicit.
By Enkhzol Dovdon
arXiv:2608. 08700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of tool routing is critical as Large Language Models increasingly operate as autonomous agents.
By Dongjie Xu, Julius, Hanchi Dong, Minghua Tang, Yuxuan Sun, Ziwei Nie, Zicheng Liu, Dujun Qing, Jiajie Xu
The paper introduces Trustworthy RAG, an evaluation agent designed to detect misinformation and knowledge poisoning in Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems. It combines natural language inference verification, a five-signal poison detector, and a weighted Trust Index to assess the reliability of retrieved content. Experiments on multiple LLMs show high accuracy and precision, with the agent effectively blocking unsafe advice in a secure-coding assistant scenario.
By Balkrishna Giri, Md Toufique Hasan, Jussi Rasku, Muhammad Waseem, Pekka Abrahamsson
The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can infer the capability requirements of a user query before generating a response. Using the TACIT framework, the authors decompose these requirements into eight classes across three axes—Source, Transformation, and World Effect—and train linear probes on hidden states from four open-weight LLM families. Their results show that these capability structures are linearly decodable with high accuracy, yet the models struggle to express the same information in natural language, a phenomenon termed "structured but silent."
By Kyojun Choo, Minsoo Song, Yunju Kang, Chanjun Park
arXiv:2606. 26101v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable evaluation of large language models should separate supported answering from unsupported guessing without conflating either with data contamination, prompt idiosyncrasy, or generic refusal behavior.
By Renwei Meng, Bowen Zhang, Jian Wang, Xican Wang, Haoyi Wu, Xuanyan Qiu, Shengan Yang
arXiv:2609.06052v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autonomous agent systems increasingly depend on reusable skill abstractions for consolidating experiential knowledge and domain expertise. These arti...
By Yizhuo Zhang, Bo Kang, Yi Yang, Zhiyu Duan, Zhouteng Ye, Shunkun Yang