arXiv AI
1d ago
An Evaluation Framework for National AI Regulation
arXiv:2608. 15417v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Governments use laws, institutions, funding programs and nonbinding guidance to shape how AI is developed and used.
Governing Artificial Intelligence: Public Preferences and Regulatory Options
arXiv:2607. 14585v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies, societies, and polities, raising fundamental questions about how it should be regulated.
Related stories
OpenAI Blog
Jul 6, 2023
Frontier AI regulation: Managing emerging risks to public safety
arXiv AI
Jul 24
Regulating autonomous and agentic AI
arXiv:2607. 21345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Regulating activities where regulatees use autonomous and agentic AI is challenging.
arXiv AI
Jun 12
The Challenges of Balancing AI Compliance and Technological Innovations in Critical Sectors: A Systematic Literature Review
arXiv:2606. 12423v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into critical infrastructure including healthcare, finance, energy, and defense, offers transformative benefits but also conflicts with evolving regulatory and governance frameworks.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
Global Index on Responsible AI: 2026 Report
arXiv:2607. 14782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Grounded in human rights-based frameworks such as the UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI) examines how countries translate responsible AI commitments into enforceable protections, institutional capacity, and redress mechanisms.
arXiv AI
Jun 17
From Democracies to Autocracies: How AI Systems Enable Authoritarianism by Design
arXiv:2606. 17286v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI-enabled authoritarianism is not confined to autocracies.
arXiv AI
Aug 7
The Closing Window: How Governments Could Lose Their Ability to Restrain Advanced AI
arXiv:2608. 05173v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As AI capabilities advance, AI systems will pose greater risks to national security and potentially humanity as a whole.
arXiv AI
1d ago
A Regulatory Placebo? The Systemic Failure of Mandatory GenAI Labeling
arXiv:2608. 16470v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We examine the worldwide trend of mandatory labeling of generative artificial intelligence(GenAI) as a reactive, symbolic form of legislation triggered by technological panic and institutional responses.
OpenAI Blog
Jul 15
The US is advancing AI safety through state and federal action
OpenAI outlines a “reverse federalism” approach to AI governance, where state laws help build a national framework for safe, democratic AI.
OpenAI Blog
Jul 10, 2019
Why responsible AI development needs cooperation on safety
We’ve written a policy research paper identifying four strategies that can be used today to improve the likelihood of long-term industry cooperation on safety norms in AI: communicating risks and benefits, technical collaboration, increased transparency, and incentivizing standards. Our analysis shows that industry cooperation on safety will be instrumental in ensuring that AI systems are safe and beneficial, but competitive pressures could lead to a collective action problem, potentially causing AI companies to under-invest in safety.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond
arXiv:2607. 02197v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The society and emerging risk-based regulatory frameworks for AI underscore the need for rigorous risk assessment to ensure safe and reliable AI systems.
OpenAI Blog
Jun 1
Our views on AI policy and political advocacy
Our approach to AI policy and political advocacy, transparency, support for thoughtful regulation and AI safety, and that no outside political group speaks on the company’s behalf.