OpenDiscoveryTrace is a public dataset of 558 complete AI scientific agent trajectories that records the reasoning process—thoughts, tool calls, observations, errors, revision triggers, and confidence—across 124 scientific tasks in drug discovery, materials science, genomics, and literature analysis. The dataset includes seven models (three frontier models and four open‑weight models) and 60 live‑retrieval variants, providing a balanced view of performance and error patterns. Pilot analysis shows that process traces reveal behavioral differences invisible to output‑only evaluation, such as differing error rates and types among frontier models.
By Aayam Bansal, Keertan Balaji
arXiv:2607. 19262v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As pathogen genomic surveillance scales, the bottleneck is shifting from data generation to analysis.
By Harmon Bhasin, Kevin Flyangolts, Dianzhuo Wang, Evan Seeyave, Arjun Banerjee, Amanda Darling, Joshua Stallings, David Stern, Shawn Higdon, Claire Duvallet, Bryan Tegomoh, Kenny Workman
The study evaluates whether detailed, profession‑specific system prompts improve performance on scientific tasks. Using an open‑source corpus of 503 agent profiles and Gemini 3.8 Flash, the authors compared matched profiles to four control prompts across nine text‑based science benchmarks and a tool‑using bioinformatics benchmark. Results show no consistent accuracy gains; matched profiles actually increased token usage and cost, and in some cases reduced success rates, with only a minor advantage in one benchmark likely due to prompt length rather than domain expertise.
By Timothy Kassis
arXiv:2606. 19245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to accelerate drug discovery by compressing interpretation and decision-making loops, but practical deployment requires trusted evaluation on realistic program decisions.
By Hannah Le, Ramesh Ramasamy, Alex Urrutia, Mahsa Yazdani, Tim Proctor, Kenny Workman
arXiv:2601. 21800v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce BioAgent Bench, an evaluation suite designed for measuring the performance and robustness of AI agents in common bioinformatics tasks.
By Dionizije Fa, Marko Culjak, Bruno Pandza, Mateo Cupic
arXiv:2609.27490v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: AI research agents need reliable knowledge of how their experiments change outcomes. We introduce WhatWorkedBench to measure experimental understanding...
By Jingjie Ning, Xueqi Li, Yibo Kong, Dongting Li
The Bioinfoysis Technical Report introduces a multi‑agent harness designed to improve long‑horizon bioinformatics tasks by maintaining persistent, artifact‑grounded analysis runs. It combines global planning with step‑wise, evidence‑driven replanning, ensuring intermediate results are tied to responsible agents and preventing stale evidence reuse. The system was evaluated on BixBench and LAB‑Bench 2, achieving state‑of‑the‑art accuracy and demonstrating that reliable bioinformatics automation relies on robust planning, execution, memory, and evidence flow.
By Qingyang Shao, Xin Zhang, Zhouyang Yuan, Xianying Chen, Yujia Xiang, Zihao Yang, Tong Ye, Yangqi Zhang, Jiakang Xu, Xiaoqing Yan, Xuan Luo, Keyi Li, Enci Fan, Kai Kang, Zhuohan Liu, Xingyu Jin, Chunran Teng, Tao Li, Xinyu Lv, Minghui Wang, Wenfeng Li, Yidan Gao, Siyu Liu, Mingrui Luo, Zhu Liang, Guanren Qiao, Zhiping Xu
The study evaluates whether a portfolio of compact, semantically named descriptor blocks can match the performance of a 2048‑dimensional CheMeleon embedding in low‑data molecular assays. Using a fixed 11‑dimensional physicochemical base and greedily adding provenance‑screened blocks, the portfolio achieves a mean test AUC of 0.762 across nine ADME/Tox assays, comparable to CheMeleon’s 0.764 and better than Mordred’s 0.756. The results meet a predeclared pooled parity threshold but not all per‑assay thresholds, and further analysis confirms the competitiveness of the auditable representation while highlighting unresolved assay‑level differences.
By Yiqi Yao, Miquel Duran-Frigola
arXiv:2608.31076v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Autonomous scientific research agents are increasingly applied to end-to-end scientific workflows, including literature review, data analysis, experi...
By Xuehai Wang, Haowei Qin, Tongxin Liu, Junkai Li, Buqiang Xu, Jintian Zhang, Yijun Chen, Zirui Xue, Shumin Deng
arXiv:2606. 16890v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Aggregate accuracy benchmarks conceal a systematic structure in how large language models fail at electronic health record (EHR) question answering: questions requiring more inferential steps produce disproportionately more errors.
By Sanjay Basu
arXiv:2607. 23975v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model research agents can connect literature retrieval, analysis code, and manuscript preparation, but coherent output does not establish scientific validity.
By Stefan G. Creadore
arXiv:2605. 17554v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Frontier deep research agents (DRAs) plan a research task, synthesize across documents, and return a structured deliverable on demand.
By Tanmay Asthana, Aman Saksena, Divyansh Sahu