arXiv:2606. 27629v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cross-platform deployment of offensive comment detection for Chinese social media suffers performance degradation.
arXiv:2606. 15396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malicious content generated from large language models (LLMs) could pose severe safety risks and ethical concerns.
arXiv:2608. 15600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The widespread circulation of abusive online content has increased the need for reliable moderation of Chinese social-media text.
The paper proposes a training‑time explainability framework that aligns model reasoning with human‑annotated rationales to improve both classification performance and interpretability for multilingual hate speech detection. It is evaluated on HateXplain (English) and BullySent (Hinglish), datasets that capture anti‑Muslim hate in culturally coded, multilingual forms. Using methods such as LIME, Integrated Gradients, Grad‑X‑Input, and attention, the study shows that gradient‑ and attention‑based regularization boosts F‑scores, enhances plausibility and faithfulness, and captures culturally specific cues for detecting implicit anti‑Muslim hate.
arXiv:2607. 15267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Poisoning pretraining data can introduce harmful behaviors to LMs that are difficult to detect and mitigate.
The paper introduces FAID, a fine‑grained adaptive framework for detecting implicit hate speech. It first classifies samples into Shallow, Targeted, or Context‑Dependent categories and then applies tailored strategies—prompt‑tuning for shallow cases, knowledge augmentation for targeted ones, and an agentic prompt‑generation system for context‑dependent posts. Experiments on four benchmark datasets show that FAID outperforms state‑of‑the‑art baselines by allocating computational effort only where needed.
CIBuzzBench is a new benchmark that tests cross‑lingual understanding of Chinese internet buzzwords by providing 3,001 buzzwords with English explanations, equivalents, category labels, and harmfulness annotations. The benchmark defines three tasks—Meaning Explanation, Cross‑lingual Equivalent Matching, and Culturally Grounded Harmfulness Detection—to evaluate how well large language models translate and interpret these culturally nuanced terms. Experiments show that current state‑of‑the‑art LLMs still struggle with fine‑grained non‑literal meanings, robust matching, and accurate harmfulness detection across languages.
The paper introduces WSF-ARG+, a new dataset that pairs hate speech with check‑worthiness annotations, and presents an LLM‑in‑the‑loop framework to streamline the annotation process. Experiments with 12 open‑weight large language models demonstrate that the framework cuts human effort while maintaining annotation quality. The study also shows that incorporating check‑worthiness labels improves hate‑speech detection performance, boosting macro‑F1 scores for large models by up to 0.213 and averaging 0.154 across models.
arXiv:2607. 03680v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent AI-generated text detection work often introduces a new benchmark together with a specialized detector tailored to it.
arXiv:2609.36290v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate the extent to which the Hamas attacks on Israel of October 7, 2023, have affected German social media debates about Judaism and Israel...
arXiv:2609.16393v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce ParsHate, a manually annotated dataset of 10,000 Persian tweets spanning 2013-2022, representing the first decade-long benchmark for hate...
arXiv:2607. 14957v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Online firestorms are rapid collective escalations of highly negative user-generated content and may cause substantial reputational and economic damage.
arXiv:2606. 18852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classifying implicit hate speech remains a challenge, as intent is often masked through insinuation and context rather than explicit slurs.