The paper introduces PERPL, a framework for tailoring fact‑checking explanations to individual readers while preserving factual accuracy. It learns personalized rewriting from relative preferences of simulated LLM readers, using cross‑persona pairing to generate supervision and a progressive learning strategy to refine explanations beyond predefined styles. Experiments show PERPL outperforms larger general‑purpose LLMs in aligning with reader preferences while maintaining high factual fidelity.
By Haokun Wen, Xuemeng Song, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu
HyperTrace is a training‑free framework that personalizes large language models by tracing latent user preferences online. It maintains interpretable natural‑language hypotheses about short‑term intent and long‑term preferences, updating them with an SMC‑style reweighting process driven by an LLM‑based surrogate choice model. Experiments on PRISM and PersonaMem‑v2 demonstrate that HyperTrace improves response alignment, preference prediction, and profile consistency compared to strong online baselines.
By Jianzhi Shen, Keyu Mao, Minghao Shao, Chuanyang Jin, Yusong Wang, Ailiang Lin, Kotaro Funakoshi, Manabu Okumura, Tianmin Shu, Muhammad Shafique
The paper investigates how large language models (LLMs) can evaluate explanations in recommender systems. It generates 18 explanation prototypes and has 14 LLMs rate them, comparing the results to human ratings from a user study. Findings show that while LLMs mimic human rating patterns and correlate moderately with human judgments, their absolute agreement is low and varies with model size and evaluation design, leading to four practical recommendations for using LLMs in this context.
By Kathrin Wardatzky, Oana Inel, Luca Rossetto, Abraham Bernstein
arXiv:2610.09795v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The demand for personalized LLMs is shifting from style imitation toward content quality. We investigate whether self-distillation can bridge this gap...
By Huayi Lai, Jicheng Yang, Min Yi, Chong Meng
arXiv:2510.17881v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are typically aligned with population-level preferences, despite substantial variation across individual users. We int...
By Yizhuo Chen, Xin Liu, Ruijie Wang, Zheng Li, Pei Chen, Changlong Yu, Qingyu Yin, Priyanka Nigam, Meng Jiang, Bing Yin
arXiv:2608. 09507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Natural language user preferences provide an interpretable interface for LLM personalization.
By Yuting Liu, Wei Wu, Jianzhe Zhao, Guibing Guo
The paper introduces PROVE-REC, a two‑pass framework that generates verifiable preference proofs for large language model (LLM) recommendation systems. In Pass A, the model condenses user interaction histories into a compact proof of positive and avoidance claims linked to specific evidence entries. Pass B then uses only this proof and its evidence to predict the next item, ensuring the recommendation follows the reasoning path. Verification steps compare masked evidence and removed claims to confirm grounding and influence, while a ranking‑preservation objective retains useful historical information. Experiments on diverse real‑world datasets show PROVE‑REC outperforms strong baselines by up to 7.45%, producing claims that are both better grounded and more influential to recommendation quality.
By Yu Hou, Nathaniel Kang, Pengkai Wang, Hua Li
arXiv:2608. 12389v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-domain zero- or few-shot personalization aims to generate user-preferred responses in unseen conversational domains from only a handful of target-domain interactions.
By Xuefei Wang, Jun Han, Zixuan Wang, Qingkai Zeng, Xiao Wang, Ruijie Wang, Jianxin Li
arXiv:2605.05911v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Product reviews significantly influence purchasing decisions on e-commerce platforms. However, the sheer volume of reviews can overwhelm users, obs...
By Millend Roy, Agostino Capponi, Vineet Goyal
The paper introduces PerFine, a training‑free critique‑refine framework that improves large language model personalization. In each iteration, a generator drafts text conditioned on a retrieved user profile, while a critic—also conditioned on the same profile—provides structured feedback on tone, vocabulary, sentence structure, and topicality. The generator revises the draft, and a knockout strategy selects the best version across iterations; additional inference‑time techniques such as Best‑of‑N and Topic Extraction further balance quality and efficiency. Experiments on Yelp, Goodreads, and Amazon datasets show PerFine consistently outperforms existing retrieval‑augmented methods like PGraphRAG, achieving G‑Eval gains of +8.5‑12% and steady improvements over 3‑5 refinement iterations.
By Durga Prasad Maram, Dhruvin Gandhi, Zonghai Yao, Gayathri Akkinapalli, Franck Dernoncourt, Yu Wang, Ryan A. Rossi, Nesreen K. Ahmed
arXiv:2603.04191v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users may share individual preferences over extended interactio...
By Qianyun Guo, Yibo Li, Yue Liu, Bryan Hooi
arXiv:2504.20106v4 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Ensuring that large language models (LLMs) are both helpful and harmless is a critical challenge, as overly strict constraints can lead to excessiv...
By Ren-Wei Liang, Chin-Ting Hsu, Chan-Hung Yu, Saransh Agrawal, Shih-Cheng Huang, Chieh-Yen Lin, Shang-Tse Chen, Kuan-Hao Huang, Shao-Hua Sun