arXiv:2606. 19704v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent benchmarks are growing fast, but no single benchmark touches more than four or five of the dimensions that deployment exposes.
arXiv:2609.07785v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An LLM-agent leaderboard invites a familiar inference: an agent ranked above another is the better agent. Public evaluation logs may not support that c...
arXiv:2602. 03238v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agent benchmark scores are shaped not only by the model but also by the agent harness, environment, evaluator, and inference budget.
Agent evaluations increasingly benchmark LLMs, but rankings can be swayed by evaluation conditions such as scaffolds or tasks, making reliability claim‑dependent. A Bayesian variance‑decomposition framework applied to 22 benchmarks shows that reliability varies with the measurement goal: fixed model‑scaffold systems rank reliably, while underlying‑model rankings are less stable. Scaffold choice can alter conclusions, and adding more tasks only modestly improves reliability when scaffold coverage is limited; however, pooling diverse benchmarks can substantially raise cross‑task ranking reliability and reduce cost.
arXiv:2607. 25891v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating AI agents in interactive environments is hindered by fragmented tasks, scaffolds, verifiers, and scoring rules.
arXiv:2607. 06624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present AgentLens, a production-assessed benchmark for interactive code agents.
arXiv:2603. 22376v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present an AI Co-Scientist framework that closes the research loop for the production search-ranking system of a large online travel platform -- pairing LLM agents with direct cloud-compute access so that idea generation, code implementation, GPU experimentation, and result analysis iterate end-to-end with a human scientist in the loop.
arXiv:2607. 02032v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating LLM agents on benchmarks like SWE-Bench and GAIA can be expensive, time-consuming, and requires complex infrastructure.
arXiv:2609.21267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Production LLM agents are evaluated repeatedly as they evolve, but full agent benchmarks are costly to rerun. We study efficient recurring evaluation f...
arXiv:2609.08248v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iterati...
arXiv:2512. 04123v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: LLM-based agents already operate in production across many industries, yet we lack an understanding of what technical methods make deployments successful.
arXiv:2604. 00594v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As the focus in LLM-based coding shifts from static single-step code generation to multi-step agentic interaction with tools and environments, understanding which tasks will challenge agents and why becomes increasingly difficult.
arXiv:2602.18998v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: LLM agents are increasingly expected to operate as general-purpose systems that resolve real-world user requests, yet their dynamic scaling behavio...