arXiv AI

ReMedI: Inference-Time Refinement and Self-Distillation for Controllable Molecular Optimization

ReMedI introduces an inference‑time refinement framework that combines a pre‑trained molecular language model with a Metropolis‑Hastings search to perform multi‑objective optimization of drug leads. The method proposes edits conditioned on the current molecule and refines them to improve properties, preserve lead similarity, and maintain scaffold integrity. Experiments on C‑MuMOInstruct and SMDD benchmarks show that ReMedI outperforms RL‑based baselines, achieving higher success rates and requiring far fewer training leads.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 7

Training Large Language Models for Small-Molecule Design with Synthetic Task Scaling

The paper explores how large language models (LLMs) can be trained for small-molecule drug design by using synthetic tasks that are cheaper to evaluate. By employing a curriculum that gradually increases task difficulty, the authors demonstrate that LLMs can learn design strategies that outperform larger models on structure-based lead optimization. This approach shows that scaling post‑training with synthetic tasks can effectively adapt LLMs to high‑cost experimental scenarios that are otherwise infeasible to train on directly.

By Frank Hu, Shriram Chennakesavalu, Zichen Wang, Patricia Suriana, Bodhi Vani, Kirill Shmilovich, Kangway Chuang, Colin Grambow
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 7

On the Design Space of Discrete Diffusion Online Adaptation for Molecular Optimization

arXiv:2607. 02834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Molecular optimization often starts from a pretrained generative model that captures a broad prior over valid molecular structures.

By Trevor Chen, Ariel Dai, Jason Yang, Riccardo De Santi, Daniel Khalil, Wenda Chu, Nate Gruver, Pranav Murugan, Alexander F. G. Goldberg, Maruan Al-Shedivat, Yisong Yue
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 16

Closed-Loop Molecular Inverse Design with Semantic LLM Surrogates

The paper introduces LoopMol, a closed‑loop molecular inverse‑design framework that uses a large language model (LLM) as a surrogate to reason directly over task instructions, SMILES optimization histories, and oracle feedback. At each iteration, the LLM selects informative reference molecules and optionally a concise guidance sentence, conditioning the next generation round and producing an inspectable optimization trace. Experiments on six drug and material tasks across three Llama‑based backbones show that the LLM‑based variant outperforms one‑shot generation and competes with or surpasses Gaussian‑process Bayesian optimization, with performance varying by task type.

By Yaoyao Xu, Xinjian Zhao, Xiaozhuang Song, Lei Bai, Tianshu Yu