arXiv Machine Learning

Best Policy Tracking in Reinforcement Learning

The paper investigates how non‑monotonic performance dynamics in single‑task reinforcement learning affect policy selection. By introducing post‑hoc diagnostic metrics, the authors evaluate common selection strategies on continuous‑control benchmarks and find that typical practices often miss the best policy, leading to suboptimal performance and wasted computation. They propose a validation‑based selection method that better approximates the best visited policy while improving efficiency.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

OGPO: Sample Efficient Full-Finetuning of Generative Control Policies

arXiv:2605. 03065v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generative control policies (GCPs), such as diffusion- and flow-based control policies, have emerged as effective parameterizations for robot learning.

By Sarvesh Patil, Mitsuhiko Nakamoto, Manan Agarwal, Shashwat Saxena, Jesse Zhang, Giri Anantharaman, Cleah Winston, Chaoyi Pan, Douglas Chen, Nai-Chieh Huang, Zeynep Temel, Oliver Kroemer, Sergey Levine, Abhishek Gupta, Hongkai Dai, Paarth Shah, Max Simchowitz
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Improving Online Reinforcement Learning via Bidirectional Behavior Prior Distillation

The paper introduces Bidirectional Behavior Prior Distillation (B2PD), a method that uses action‑value priors to train a conditional variational autoencoder for generating high‑value behavior support. These expert behavior priors are then distilled into the online reinforcement learning agent, reducing inefficient exploration and stabilizing policy updates. Experiments on state‑ and pixel‑based tasks show that B2PD improves sample efficiency while maintaining stable learning dynamics.

By Gong Gao, Xiao Lai, Jiaji Shen, Ning Jia, Xianhui Liu, Weidong Zhao
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 8

An Informational Curse of Horizon in Goal-Conditioned Policy Learning

The paper identifies an informational curse of horizon in goal-conditioned policy learning, showing that longer goal relabeling horizons during training can hurt policy generalization and performance. Controlled experiments with oracle planners separate training horizons from test horizons, revealing that behavioral cloning policies degrade with longer horizons while reinforcement learning mitigates this effect. The authors attribute this to reduced conditional mutual information between actions and hindsight-relabeled goals, and demonstrate that distilling short-horizon policy Jacobians into long-horizon policies improves performance, especially in combinatorial manipulation tasks.

By John L. Zhou, Yuxuan Dong, Jonathan C. Kao
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Limiting-Kernel Q($\lambda$): Bridging Short and Long Horizons

Limiting‑Kernel Q(λ) (LKQL) is an off‑policy value estimator that blends n‑step truncation with a long‑horizon approximation based on the limiting kernel. It maintains the computational efficiency of n‑step methods while improving policy evaluation accuracy, especially for long‑horizon tasks. The authors prove faster convergence of LKQL’s operator under aperiodicity and near‑on‑policy conditions, and demonstrate empirical gains on MuJoCo continuous‑control benchmarks.

By Tolga Ok, Arman Sharifi Kolarijani, Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani, Mohamad Amin Sharifi Kolarijani
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 3

Reusing Past Samples in Proximal Policy Optimization: When and How Does It Help?

The paper investigates how reusing past samples can improve the sample efficiency of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). Two variants, wPPO-U and wPPO-BH, are introduced within a multiple importance weighting framework, each reusing data from recent iterations while preserving core PPO mechanics. The authors derive theoretical policy improvement bounds for both variants and empirically evaluate their impact on continuous control tasks.

By Alessandro Montenegro, Riccardo Venturelli, Marco Mussi, Matteo Papini, Alberto Maria Metelli
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

Cross-Behavior Policy Optimization: Unified Learning from Offline Demonstrations and On- and Off-Policy Rollouts via a Shared Regression Target

The paper introduces Cross-Behavior Policy Optimization (CBPO), a method that unifies offline demonstrations and policy-generated rollouts into a single regression loss using a fixed-reference target. CBPO eliminates the need for separate supervised fine‑tuning and reinforcement learning objectives, allowing positive and negative offline completions, reference responses, and current and historical rollouts to share a common reward‑labeled format and replay buffer. Experiments on two model scales and four mathematical reasoning benchmarks show that CBPO, especially the CBPO‑Unified variant, outperforms baseline methods in avg@32 and pass@32 metrics, with historical rollouts providing additional gains.

By Du Cheng, Junyu Lu, Jingfan Zhang, Yuzhuo Zhang, Haoxuan Jia, Shichao Weng