arXiv AI

Investigating the Interplay between Contextual and Parametric Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness under Optimization

arXiv:2605. 24960v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) faithfulness, i.

arXiv AI
3d ago

Making LLMs Say What They Think: Measuring and Improving CoT-Interpretability Alignment

The paper introduces CoT-Interpretability Alignment (CIA), a metric that quantifies how well a large language model’s chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations match its internal reasoning processes. Evaluated on two-hop question answering, hint intervention, and integer multiplication across three LLMs, the study finds limited alignment (44.8–75.9%) and demonstrates that post‑training with a reward combining task accuracy and parametric faithfulness can substantially improve CoT faithfulness without sacrificing accuracy. The authors provide a framework for auditing CoT faithfulness and a pathway to making explicit reasoning more trustworthy, with code and data publicly available.

By Yihuai Hong, Shauli Ravfogel, Chen Zhao, Eunsol Choi
arXiv AI
Sep 17

Bypassing the Rationale: Causal Auditing of Implicit Reasoning in Language Models

The paper introduces a causal, layerwise audit method called the CoT Mediation Index (CMI) to evaluate whether chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting truly influences a language model’s internal computation. By comparing performance degradation from patching CoT-token hidden states against matched control patches, the authors find that CoT influence is often confined to narrow reasoning windows and can be nearly absent even when the model produces fluent rationales. The study shows that models explicitly tuned for reasoning exhibit stronger mediation, while Mixture-of-Experts models display more distributed mediation, indicating that CoT faithfulness varies across models and tasks.

By Anish Sathyanarayanan, Aditya Nagarsekar, Aarush Rathore