DeepMind Blog

Accelerating Mathematical and Scientific Discovery with Gemini Deep Think

Research papers point to the growing impact of Deep Think across fields

DeepMind Blog
Oct 23, 2025

Try Deep Think in the Gemini app

We're rolling out Deep Think in the Gemini app for Google AI Ultra subscribers, and we're giving select mathematicians access to the full version of the Gemini 2. 5 Deep Think model entered into the IMO competition.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

AI in Science: Early Insights

The paper "AI in Science: Early Insights" analyzes AI’s impact on scientific work using data from 15 million Gemini interactions, 2,600 specialized AI models, and a survey of 600 scientists. It finds widespread AI adoption, complementary use of large language models and specialized tools, significant productivity gains of about seven hours per week, and a shift in research bottlenecks toward hypothesis backlog and verification needs. The study suggests AI can boost scientific productivity but its full effect depends on addressing new downstream challenges.

By Mihai Codreanu, Alex Imas, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Joseph Emmens, Evalyne Muiruri, Arthur Turrell, Julian Jacobs, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Ana Trisovic, Yiyuan Chen, Tanya Rodchenko, Catherine Pollard, Scott Strand, Daniel Rock, Zanna Iscenko, Fabien Curto Millet, Neil Thompson, James Manyika
arXiv AI
Jul 29

Structured Scaling of AI Discovery Across Diverse Scientific Domains

arXiv:2604. 19341v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Scientific discovery often requires many cycles of proposing, testing, and refining candidate solutions.

By Haotian Ye, Haowei Lin, Jingyi Tang, Yizhen Luo, Rahul Thapa, Caiyin Yang, Chang Su, Rui Yang, Ruihua Liu, Rundao Li, Zeyu Li, Pengwei Sun, Chong Gao, Dachao Ding, Guangrong He, Miaolei Zhang, Lina Sun, Wenyang Wang, Yuchen Zhong, Zhuohao Shen, Puheng Li, Pan Lu, Bianxiao Cui, Di He, Jianzhu Ma, Junfeng Li, Hexi Baoyin, Yejin Choi, Stefano Ermon, Xiaowen Chu, Tongyang Li, Yuzhi Xu, James Zou
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 9

Can LLMs extract scientific consensus? A case study in high-temperature superconductivity

arXiv:2606. 07570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scientific knowledge is increasingly dispersed across vast and heterogeneous scientific literature, where important claims are often implicit, evolving, and internally debated.

By Mouyang Cheng, Wenhao He, Zhuotao Jin, Bowen Yu, Ju Li, Boris Kozinsky, Yao Wang, Pavel Volkov, Liangzi Deng, Ching-Wu Chu, Xiao-Gang Wen, Mingda Li