arXiv:2607. 07026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constrained decoding is essential for serving LLMs, ensuring that generated outputs follow specific structures such as JSON schema-formatted function calls.
By Meihua Dang, Stefano Ermon
Constrained decoding is essential for serving LLMs, ensuring that generated outputs follow specific structures such as JSON schema-formatted function calls. Existing systems are designed for autoregressive models and assume left-to-right generation, masking out invalid next tokens at each step.
arXiv:2607. 20483v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constraining the generation of autoregressive large language models (LLMs) is an important component of integrating language models into formal systems.
By Max Scribner, Antonio Vergari, Vaishak Belle
arXiv:2609.39368v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A common formalism for constraining the output of autoregressive text generation models involves lexical constraints, words or phrases which are requir...
By Sean Papay, Roman Klinger
arXiv:2510. 01902v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language Models (LMs) are increasingly used in applications where generated outputs must satisfy strict semantic or syntactic constraints.
By Pawe{\l} Parys, Sairam Vaidya, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Loris D'Antoni
arXiv:2602.00612v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) have demonstrated promising generative capabilities and are increasingly used to produce formal languages d...
By Yitong Zhang, Yongmin Li, Yuetong Liu, Jia Li, Xiaoran Jia, Zherui Li, Ge Li
arXiv:2601. 21237v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Kleinberg and Mullainathan recently proposed a formal framework for studying the phenomenon of language generation, called language generation in the limit.
By Aaron Li, Ian Zhang
The paper introduces Grammar‑Aligned Decoding (GAD), addressing the issue that conventional grammar‑constrained decoding (GCD) can distort a large language model’s probability distribution, yielding grammatical but low‑likelihood outputs. GAD proposes an adaptive sampling method, Approximate Expected Futures (ASAp), which uses prior samples to over‑approximate future grammaticality, ensuring outputs remain both grammatical and faithful to the model’s conditional probabilities. Experiments on code generation and structured NLP tasks demonstrate that ASAp often produces higher‑likelihood outputs than existing GCD techniques while still enforcing the required grammatical constraints.
By Kanghee Park, Jiayu Wang, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Nadia Polikarpova, Loris D'Antoni
arXiv:2603.01243v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are powerful tools that have found applications beyond human-machine interfaces and chatbots. Beside free-form generat...
By Ayoub Hammal, Pierre Zweigenbaum, Caio Corro
arXiv:2603. 03305v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to generate executable outputs, JSON objects, and API calls, where a single syntax error can make the output unusable.
By Avinash Reddy, Thayne T. Walker, James S. Ide, Amrit Singh Bedi
arXiv:2608. 01320v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Language generation in the limit is a theoretical framework for studying how a generator can learn to produce new valid strings from a stream of positive examples.
By Ziyi Cai, Shuangping Li, Yiheng Shen, Kangning Wang, Peng Zhang
arXiv:2606. 00722v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Controlling language model outputs is essential for ensuring structural validity, reliability, and downstream usability, and diffusion language models are no exception.
By Hyundong Jin, Yo-Sub Han