← Back to all news
arXiv Machine Learning

Bandit Multiclass PAC Learning: Structural Baselines and a Confidence Direct Sum

arXiv:2609. 29694v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: How much does high confidence cost when a multiclass learner sees only whether its prediction is correct?

Related stories

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Bandit Multiclass PAC Learning: Corrected Lower Bounds, Exact Families, and a Confidence Direct-Sum Phenomenon

The paper revisits realizable multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, correcting a previously claimed lower bound on sample complexity. It introduces a new anchored dimension, “aBDS,” and establishes a constant‑free three‑part lower bound, while also providing tighter upper bounds that eliminate dependence on the total label count. The authors demonstrate that the optimal sample complexity can vary dramatically even among classes with identical dimensional profiles, revealing a confidence direct‑sum phenomenon and a rank‑saturation phase transition.

By Guangjian Zhang
reinforcement-learning
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

A Complexity Measure for Active Learning in Multi-group Mean Estimation

arXiv:2606. 14690v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study a \emph{max-risk} objective for active learning in a multi-group mean estimation $d$-armed bandits: a learner adaptively allocates a budget of $T$ samples across $d$ groups to minimize the worst-case uncertainty index $\max_{k\in[d]}\sigma_k^2/n_k$, where $\sigma_k$ is the standard deviation of the distribution of arm $d$, and $n_k$ is the number of times arm $d$ is sampled.

By Abdellah Aznag, Rachel Cummings, Adam N. Elmachtoub
benchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Oct 1

On the Complexity of Preference-Based Bandits

The paper investigates preference-based bandits where a learner selects pairs of arms and receives binary preference feedback modeled by Bradley–Terry. It introduces the locally sensitive eluder dimension, a new complexity measure for logistic preference feedback, and proposes the GINOP algorithm that uses log-loss confidence sets to balance optimism and exploration. The authors prove a first-order regret bound showing that learning with preference feedback can be as statistically efficient as learning from direct rewards, and they validate their theory with empirical experiments.

By Ahmed Ben Yahmed (CREST, ENSAE Paris, FAIRPLAY), Marc Abeille (FAIRPLAY), Cl\'ement Calauz\`enes (FAIRPLAY)
reinforcement-learning
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 15

High-Probability Regret Bounds for Feel-Good Thompson Sampling

The paper presents the first high‑probability regret bounds for both cumulative and current‑step variants of Feel‑Good Thompson Sampling (FGTS) in contextual bandits with general realizable function approximation. The bounds rely on decoupling coefficients and prior mass near the true reward function, and in the linear setting they achieve ≠d√T log(2T)+√T log(1/δ) regret with probability at least 1‑δ. This matches the dimension and horizon dependence of upper‑confidence‑bound algorithms up to logarithmic factors, while the high‑probability cost adds only linear dependence on log(1/δ).

By Xuheng Li, Qingyue Zhao, Quanquan Gu
llms
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

Accelerating Linear Bandits with Persistent Candidate Sets

The paper introduces Persistent Candidate LinUCB (PC‑LinUCB), a variant of the LinUCB algorithm for linear bandits that reduces per‑round score evaluations from ≥×K to ≥×(k+q) by maintaining a small set of active actions and sampling challengers from the remaining actions. It provides high‑probability regret bounds that include a standard learning term and an additive discovery cost of order ≥×((K-k)×log(K-k))/q, which does not grow with the horizon. Experiments demonstrate that PC‑LinUCB accelerates LinUCB while keeping regret comparable, and the persistent candidate approach can be applied beyond LinUCB.

By Bingkui Tong, Daria Korovaitceva, Marina Sheshukova, Sergey Samsonov, Junpei Komiyama
reinforcement-learning
More like this →