RaReCache is a framework that allows a large target language model to decode accurately from a KV cache prefilled by a much smaller source model by selectively recomputing only critical token positions. It identifies these positions using a rank disagreement metric that scores tokens based on the energy of their mapped KV in output directions weakly supported by calibration data. Across two model families and five benchmarks, RaReCache achieves up to a 3.04× prefill speedup and significantly reduces prefill latency while maintaining 95–99% of target accuracy with a 30–40% recompute budget.
By Sreetama Sarkar, Saptarshi Mitra, Sitao Huang, Souvik Kundu, Peter A. Beerel
arXiv:2608. 03893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Production deployments often swap between different-sized models in a family for cost-quality cascading, mid-conversation switching, and routing, and each swap forces the receiver to repay the prefill from scratch.
By Taekyung Heo, Rasoul Shafipour, Ritchie Zhao, Maximilian Golub, Mohammad Mahdi Kamani, Ritika Borkar, Makesh Tarun Chandran, Pantea Zardoshti, Bita Darvish Rouhani
arXiv:2610.15509v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: KV caches make long-context serving efficient by reusing past computation, but model switching breaks this reuse and forces the receiver to prefill t...
By Haomiao Qiu, Yining Tang, Zijia Song, Ruizi Han, Ziyue Qiao, Miao Zhang
arXiv:2608.30963v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern large language model (LLM) serving systems increasingly operate over repeated or shared context, yet each model typically performs its own pre...
By Yi Li, Dongming Jiang, Yi Zhao, Bingzhe Li
arXiv:2608. 08684v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked by KV cache memory, yet distributing a limited cache budget across layers remains challenging.
By Dongjie Xu, Kai Qian, Julius, Weijie Shi, Yuxuan Sun, Minghua Tang, Fenglei Jin, Hanchi Dong, Jiajie Xu
arXiv:2609.32259v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Recent multi-agent LLM systems increasingly combine heterogeneous models for specialized agent roles. However, text-based communication requires ea...
By Vincent-Daniel Yun, Woosang Lim, Haneul Yoo, Sungjoo Yoo, Murali Annavaram, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy
arXiv:2609.14507v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Single-GPU long-context inference with Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models requires spilling the key-value cache (KVCache) to CPU memory. The spilled KV...
By Enda Yu, Dezun Dong, Xiangke Liao
arXiv:2606. 06256v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As the input length of large language model (LLM) serving continues to grow, the KV cache has become a dominant bottleneck in AI infrastructure.
By Yang Liu, ZhaoKai Luo, HuaYi Jin, ZhiYong Wang, RuoZhou He, BoYu Wang, Guanjie Chen, Junhao Hu
arXiv:2609.34054v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Multi-LoRA agent systems enable efficient role specialization by sharing a common backbone model. However, each agent repeatedly processes the grow...
By Hyesung Jeon, Hyeongju Ha, Jae-Joon Kim
arXiv:2606. 24506v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Emerging LLM services increasingly host many sparse MoE models, yet most models receive sparse requests and remain cold.
By Zhuoren Ye, Tianyu Wo, Dinghao Xue, Mingming Zhang, Yuchen Teng, Chunming Hu, Renyu Yang
The paper introduces Group-Query Latent Attention (GQLA), a variant of Multi-head Latent Attention that shares group‑sharded up‑projections to enable a joint latent representation and a shardable expanded cache. GQLA supports both MQA‑absorb and GQA execution using the same weights and existing kernels, and roofline analysis shows how absorption trades traffic for computation while GQA shards KV groups. Experiments on DeepSeek‑V3.1‑Base and other models demonstrate that GQLA achieves comparable training losses to MLA, maintains high accuracy after checkpoint conversion, and improves output throughput by up to 35% on eight H20‑3e GPUs, while also allowing larger batch sizes due to a smaller per‑rank cache.
By Fanxu Meng, Zhixin Pan
arXiv:2610. 10552v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Comparing parameter-efficient fine-tuning recipes under a single, shared learning rate is a common but flawed practice: when the arms being compared have very different trainable-parameter counts, a shared rate can simultaneously depress the larger arms' means and inflate their variance, manufacturing a large, seemingly multi-seed-significant advantage for the smallest arm that is not a real effect.
By Yufeng Wang