arXiv:2405. 07708v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Decentralized learning (DL) enables participants to collaboratively train models without a central server, yet it faces significant scalability challenges that demand sparsification to reduce the prohibitive communication costs of peer-to-peer exchange.
By Sayan Biswas, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, Rafael Pires, Rishi Sharma, Milos Vujasinovic
The paper demonstrates that in decentralized federated learning, secure aggregation implemented through local neighborhood aggregation can leak private model updates. By exploiting the asymmetric aggregate views available to colluding semi‑honest nodes, the authors formulate the problem as a Hidden Subset Sum Problem and develop a lattice‑based reconstruction attack. Experiments on image, tabular, and text datasets show that attackers can recover honest participants’ updates and reconstruct private training data.
By Wenrui Yu, Changlong Ji, Johannes Bjerva, Qiongxiu Li
arXiv:2604. 07125v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This article presents DDP-SA, a scalable privacy-preserving federated learning framework that jointly leverages client-side local differential privacy (LDP) and full-threshold additive secret sharing (ASS) for secure aggregation.
By Wenjing Wei, Farid Nait-Abdesselam, Alla Jammine
Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while retaining data locality, thereby enhancing user privacy. However, traditional FL frameworks rely on a centralized aggregation server and assume honest-but-curious clients, making them susceptible to both server-side inference and client-side poisoning attacks.
arXiv:2607. 06612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models while retaining data locality, thereby enhancing user privacy.
By Harsh Kasyap, Anil Kumar Pradhan, Ugur Ilker Atmaca, Graham Cormode, Carsten Maple
The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv:2606. 07277v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Secure aggregation allows a server to aggregate users' local updates while preserving update privacy.
By Lanxin Yi, Jinbao Zhu, Kai Wan, Xiaohu Tang
Dealing simultaneously with confidentiality and Byzantine behaviors in decentralized learning is a challenging problem. Indeed, in decentralized learning, clients train a machine learning model while keeping their data locally and share their model parameters or gradients with a set of neighbors.
arXiv:2609.15521v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Federated learning enables multiple parties to train a shared model without centralizing raw data with the help of an aggregator, but introduces integr...
By Doryan Lesaignoux, Enrique M\'armol Campos, Gabriele Spini, Jos\'e L. Hern\'andez-Ramos, Stephan Krenn
arXiv:2607. 20890v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-device federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving and personalized model training on resource-constrained devices such as smartphones and IoT nodes.
By Hyeong-Gun Joo, Songnam Hong, Dong-Joon Shin
arXiv:2606. 19129v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dealing simultaneously with confidentiality and Byzantine behaviors in decentralized learning is a challenging problem.
By Ousmane Touat, C\'esar Sabater, Mohamed Maouche, Sonia Ben Mokhtar
Heterogeneous Differential Privacy (HDP) in Federated Learning (FL) allows clients to select individual privacy budgets ($\varepsilon_i$) according to institutional policies and data sensitivity. In practice, many HDP-FL systems employ $\varepsilon$-aware server aggregation to improve model utility by re-weighting client updates according to their declared privacy budgets.