The paper introduces TrustPropRAG, a method that builds a document relation graph to propagate reliability signals across documents in retrieval‑augmented generation systems. By anchoring this propagation with a limited set of human feedback on document reliability, the approach estimates trust scores through an optimization problem that incorporates pairwise relations and user input. These trust scores are then used to select more reliable documents and generate answers that are aware of document trustworthiness, leading to improved retrieval quality and exact match performance compared to baselines, even with sparse or noisy feedback.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems rely on external corpora that may contain outdated, contradictory, noisy, or unreliable documents, introducing reliability risks. Prior work has leveraged...
arXiv:2609.07075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is commonly evaluated by whether the final answer is correct. That test is insufficient: an answer can match its r...
ReliableRAG is a new framework for Retrieval-Augmented Generation that tackles misinformation in multi‑hop question answering. It extracts structured triples from retrieved documents, evaluates each triple’s reliability by combining semantic relevance to the query with credibility, and keeps only the top‑K reliable, non‑redundant triples. Using these refined triples, the system builds robust reasoning chains that filter out deceptive misinformation and produce accurate, trustworthy answers.
arXiv:2605. 17301v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems implicitly assume mutual consistency among retrieved documents -- an assumption that frequently fails in practice.
arXiv:2607. 22584v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipelines rank retrieved documents by semantic similarity alone, without accounting for source provenance or credibility.
arXiv:2608. 16515v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves large language models by grounding generation in external evidence, but it also introduces a source trust problem: retrieved context may be useful, irrelevant, or even misleading.
arXiv:2606. 05901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed the landscape of Natural Language Processing.
arXiv:2609.24028v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generating coherent meta-reviews from multiple peer reviews is challenging when reviewer evidence conflicts and varies in reliability. Existing approac...
arXiv:2608. 03292v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long Document Visual Question Answering (LongDocVQA) requires Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to locate, integrate, and reason over heterogeneous document elements distributed across multiple pages.
arXiv:2609.22537v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Enterprise AI assistants must produce responses that are verifiable and traceable to source evidence. However, retrieval augmented generation (RAG) ove...
arXiv:2609.22805v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Natural language generation (NLG) tasks span the spectrum of conditional entropy, ranging from highly constrained machine translation to open-ended dia...
CARA is a training‑free, causally guided retrieval agent designed for question answering over text‑rich knowledge graphs. It evaluates retrieved evidence using two causal criteria—consequentiality and essentiality—alongside path consistency, and aggregates results from multiple agents via reciprocal rank fusion. Experiments on three STaRK datasets show that CARA outperforms existing retrievers, improving answer quality and faithfulness while examining fewer graph nodes and requiring fewer retrieval operations.