arXiv Computation and Language

Reasoning Meets Personalization: Unleashing the Potential of Large Reasoning Model for Personalized Generation

arXiv Computation and Language
4d ago

Building Multilingual Bridges: Data Mixing as the Pillar of Generalization for In-Language Reasoning

arXiv:2609.10445v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reasoning language models have made substantial advances on a variety of complex tasks, yet their capabilities remain overwhelmingly English-centric: m...

By Mehrnaz Mofakhami, Ananya Sahu, Alejandro R. Salamanca, Daniel D'souza, Alexandre Berard, Thomas Euyang, Marzieh Fadaee, Julia Kreutzer
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Reasoning over Semantic IDs Enhances Generative Recommendation

arXiv:2603. 23183v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in generative recommendation have leveraged pretrained LLMs by formulating sequential recommendation as autoregressive generation over a unified token space comprising language tokens and itemic identifiers, where each item is represented by a compact sequence of discrete tokens, namely Semantic IDs (SIDs).

By Yingzhi He, Yan Sun, Junfei Tan, Yuxin Chen, Xiaoyu Kong, Chunxu Shen, Xiang Wang, An Zhang, Tat-Seng Chua
arXiv AI
Aug 18

Reasoning-Based Personalized Generation for Users with Sparse Data

arXiv:2602. 21219v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) personalization holds great promise for tailoring responses by leveraging personal context and history.

By Bo Ni, Branislav Kveton, Samyadeep Basu, Subhojyoti Mukherjee, Leyao Wang, Franck Dernoncourt, Sungchul Kim, Seunghyun Yoon, Zichao Wang, Ruiyi Zhang, Puneet Mathur, Jihyung Kil, Jiuxiang Gu, Nedim Lipka, Yu Wang, Ryan A. Rossi, Tyler Derr
arXiv Machine Learning
4d ago

Do Reasoning Representations Help Humans Evaluate LLM Outputs?

The paper investigates whether reasoning representations—explanations for large language model outputs—aid humans in evaluating those outputs. A controlled human study tested six reasoning formats across tasks of varying complexity, measuring structural understanding, error detection, and trust calibration. Results revealed a mismatch: participants favored planning- and decomposition-based representations, yet simpler chain-of-thought traces better supported verification, trust, and interpretability, while preferred formats increased calibration risks.

By Jaewoo Lim, Sungbok Shin, Sanghyun Hong
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

Self-Speculation for Faster Reasoning Models

arXiv:2608.20359v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are deployed for increasingly complex tasks involving planning and multi-step decision making, but high-quality performanc...

By Ravisri Valluri, Tung Nguyen, Aditya Grover