arXiv:2607. 04993v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Many phenomena of deep learning are dynamical: they concern not only which minima exist, but how gradient descent reaches, avoids, or selects among them.
By Thomas Hofmann
The paper investigates how continuous symmetries in neural networks, which give rise to conserved quantities under gradient flow, behave when training with finite‑step gradient descent at the edge of stability (EOS). By applying central flow dynamics, the authors show that curvature corrections cause a finite‑dimensional drift driven by oscillation covariance along critical parameter directions. They analyze this effect in a scalar two‑layer model, two‑layer matrix factorisation, and a two‑layer ReLU network, demonstrating which conservation laws persist or break under EOS conditions.
By Naima Elosegui Borras, Georgios Arvanitidis
The paper investigates how stochastic gradient descent (SGD) selects specific functional decompositions when training a deep linear residual network to learn the identity function. Although many weight configurations minimize the population loss, SGD consistently prefers particular solutions, especially under anisotropic label noise or different parametrizations. The authors explain this bias using an entropic loss term that penalizes the expected squared norm of the minibatch gradient, analytically characterizing its minimizers and showing that trained networks align with these predictions.
By Andy Arditi, Weian Xie, David Bau, Liu Ziyin
arXiv:2607. 21005v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Most explanations of training instability focus on \emph{learning-rate criticality}, typically characterized by the Edge of Stability, beyond which optimization becomes unstable.
By Xiaolong Li, Zhangchen Zhou, Zhi-Qin John Xu
arXiv:2606. 18080v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Gradient descent in deep learning may operate at the edge of stability (EoS), a regime in which the largest eigenvalue of the loss Hessian hovers near the stability threshold $2/\eta$, where $\eta$ is the learning rate.
By Pierre Marion
arXiv:2607. 07845v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Hessian of the training loss governs the local geometry of the loss landscape, yet despite existing explanations for its largest eigenvalues, the origin of the vast multitude of vanishingly small eigenvalues remains elusive.
By Marcel K\"uhn, Bernd Rosenow
arXiv:2511. 02258v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper studies the high-dimensional scaling limits of online stochastic gradient descent (SGD).
By Parsa Rangriz
The paper derives an exact discrete‑time law that captures how learning‑rate schedules and weight decay interact in scale‑invariant neural networks, showing that a single scalar quantity governs the effective step size. It demonstrates that the balance point between contraction and expansion is intrinsically unstable, leading to recurrent dynamics when using constant learning rates with weight decay. The authors extend this analysis to various optimizers and datasets, confirming the law’s precision and showing that performance peaks sharply at the predicted boundary.
By Hasan Amin, Wei-Kai Chang, Rajiv Khanna
The paper models the dynamics of Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) as a percolation process, showing that architectural symmetries cause subnetworks to merge in discrete blocks rather than sequentially. These structural transitions produce variance spikes in a macroscopic order parameter, analogous to physical phase transitions. The authors also demonstrate that this trapping mechanism and its scaling cascade apply to Adam and AdamW under a heavy‑tailed noise model.
By Sai Niranjan Ramachandran, Suvrit Sra
arXiv:2607. 10285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study how unsupervised autoencoders trained on microscopic spin configurations from the Ising model learn macroscopic, theory-relevant variables underlying the data-generating process.
By Max Weinmann, Miriam Klopotek
The paper investigates how normalization makes neural networks scale‑invariant, creating a feedback loop between learning‑rate schedules and weight decay that controls the effective step size of the optimizer. It derives an exact discrete‑time law showing that a single scalar quantity captures all schedule and decay effects, with norm growth providing a self‑quenching counter‑force that defines a sharp boundary between contraction‑ and expansion‑dominated regimes. Through exact analysis of a normalized regression model and experiments on MLPs, CNNs, GPT‑2, and various datasets, the authors demonstrate that constant learning rates with weight decay are intrinsically unstable, leading to recurrent dynamics, and that adaptive optimizers exhibit weaker stabilization under normalization.
"whyItMatters":"The study provides a precise, actionable rule for controlling training dynamics and schedule design in modern deep learning by isolating a single governing quantity for scale‑invariant optimization."
The paper investigates how symmetries in network inputs can mislead representational similarity analyses (RSAs). It shows that functionally equivalent representations, arising from stimulus symmetries, can produce distinct RSMs that depict different representational geometries—from disentangled to maximally mixed. The authors demonstrate that training dynamics such as stochastic gradient descent or energetic regularization can yield sparse, drifting codes, causing RSMs to drift over time, and that these effects also appear in networks trained on image data with latent symmetries.
By Farhad Pashakhanloo, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth