arXiv:2607. 10669v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian optimization is increasingly used to guide data-efficient experimentation in chemistry, materials science, and related laboratory settings, but its practical performance depends strongly on how well surrogate-model assumptions match the geometry and noise structure of the underlying objective.
By L. A. Zhukov, E. V. Shaburova, D. V. Antonets
The paper introduces Finite-Library Input-Warped Bayesian Optimization (FLIWBO), a method that selects input warps from a finite library to adapt the geometry used by Gaussian‑process Bayesian optimization. FLIWBO maintains high‑probability convergence guarantees while improving sample efficiency on problems where raw coordinates poorly match the objective’s geometry, such as log‑scaled hyperparameters or localized peaks. Experiments on synthetic benchmarks, Fashion‑MNIST hyperparameter tuning, and a 20‑dimensional multi‑agent system design demonstrate that FLIWBO‑UCB outperforms raw‑coordinate GP‑UCB and other methods with regret guarantees, especially under misspecified geometry.
By Edvin Ketabati Augustinsson, Robert A. Bridges
arXiv:2603. 29730v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present mlr3mbo, a modular toolbox for Bayesian optimization in R.
By Marc Becker, Lennart Schneider, Martin Binder, Lars Kotthoff, Bernd Bischl
arXiv:2607. 29225v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bayesian Optimization (BO) is widely adopted for data-efficient optimization in scientific and engineering applications, yet its computational cost is rarely evaluated alongside optimization performance.
By Panagiotis Krokidas, Christoforos Rekatsinas, Vassilis Sioros, Grigorios M. Chatziathanasiou, Efi-Maria Papia, George Giannakopoulos
arXiv:2608. 00641v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) relies on a surrogate model and an acquisition function, yet the most suitable choices vary across tasks and optimization stages.
By Changquan Zhao, Yuxiang Sun, Ruihao Zhu, Cheng Hua, Yulian He
arXiv:2606. 00862v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms (SAEAs) have been widely used for expensive black-box optimization problems.
By Xiao Jin, Yongxiong Wang, Haobo Liu, Yudong Du, Yukun Du
arXiv:2511. 02570v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) is a widely used approach to hyperparameter optimization (HPO).
By Lukas Fehring, Marcel Wever, Maximilian Splieth\"over, Leona Hennig, Henning Wachsmuth, Marius Lindauer
arXiv:2608. 07859v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Preferential Bayesian optimization (PBO) optimizes objectives accessible only through pairwise user comparisons.
By Ketong Shao, Jialu Wang, Xuekai Pei, Ali Mesbah
arXiv:2607. 08791v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Designing effective multi-objective Bayesian optimization (MOBO) algorithms requires balancing many interdependent design choices whose optimal configuration is problem-dependent and typically demands deep expertise.
By Georgios Laskaris, Reuben Brasher, Niki van Stein, Elena Raponi, Thomas B\"ack, Florian Neukart
arXiv:2606. 07841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Black-box variational inference (BBVI) is a methodology for posterior approximation that relies on stochastic optimization.
By Trevor Campbell, Jonathan H. Huggins, Kyurae Kim, Charles C. Margossian
arXiv:2601. 07094v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Bayesian optimization (BO) iteratively fits a Gaussian process (GP) surrogate to accumulated evaluations and selects new queries via an acquisition function.
By Jiguang Li, Hengrui Luo
The article investigates how Bayesian optimization can improve the ACTS parameter optimization suite for charged‑particle reconstruction. By comparing Expected Improvement and Upper Confidence Bound with TPE and random search on an eight‑parameter problem, extending the best method to fifteen parameters, and applying Expected Hypervolume Improvement for multi‑objective tuning, the study shows that Bayesian acquisition methods find strong configurations earlier and maintain advantages in held‑out validation. The results demonstrate that Bayesian optimization enhances ACTS auto‑tuning through more efficient evaluations, broader search spaces, and the ability to select from non‑dominated trade‑off solutions.
By Chance LaVoie, Qi Bin Lei, Rocky Bala Garg, Lauren Tompkins