arXiv:2609.15193v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Drifting models offer a promising route to faster generative AI: they perform gradual transport during training, while generating new samples in a sing...
By Arthur St\'ephanovitch, Eddie Aamari
arXiv:2608. 07924v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Drifting models are a recent class of one-step generative models that evolve the model distribution during training using a predefined sample-based drift field.
By Drake Brown, Yuhao Huang, Shih-Hsin Wang, Bao Wang
In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising. Although prior work shows that these parameterizations lead to different empirical behaviors, the mechanisms underlying their respective advantages remain to be underexplored, and how to combine them effectively is still unclear.
arXiv:2607. 12171v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In rectified-flow-based generative models, the neural network can be trained to predict two different targets, such as the instantaneous velocity or the data endpoint, to perform denoising.
By Xu Han, Jiajing Hu, Li-Ping Liu
The paper presents a new one‑step generative modeling framework for finite state spaces, leveraging discrete Wasserstein geometry to define a target‑relative KL gradient flow over a reversible Markov kernel. The authors implement this flow at the particle level using Markov jumps and encode the resulting transport updates into a latent‑conditioned generator, enabling one‑step inference after training. Experiments on a controlled setting confirm KL dissipation, consistency between particle dynamics and probability flow, and accurate numerical scaling, while a finite‑capacity neural generator successfully tracks the exact transport targets.
By Alessandro Micheli, Andrea Zerio, Samir Bhatt
arXiv:2605. 12183v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Drifting Models have emerged as a new paradigm for one-step generative modeling, achieving strong image quality without iterative inference.
By Ali Falahati, Elliot Creager, Gautam Kamath, Shubhankar Mohapatra
Generative models have undergone many generations of evolution, from VAEs/GANs to diffusion/flow matching. Along the way, the underlying techniques have become more complicated and various beliefs about what drives strong empirical performance have taken hold.
arXiv:2605. 00941v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Flow matching has become a leading framework for generative modeling, but quantifying the uncertainty of its samples remains an open problem.
By Jiarui Xing, Song Wang, Jian Wang
arXiv:2606. 16073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Sampling from complex, unnormalized probability densities is a fundamental challenge in Bayesian inference and probabilistic modeling.
By Kirill Korolev, Nikita Morozov, Stepan Pavlenko, Esmeralda S. Whitammer, Sergey Samsonov
arXiv:2606. 07481v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides high-fidelity flow fields for optimizing indoor environments, its computational cost limits rapid exploration.
By Chris R. Jung, Markus D\"orr, Natalie J\"ungling, Jennifer Niessner, Adam T. M\"uller, Nicolaj C. Stache
arXiv:2605. 29920v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce Midpoint Generative Models (MGM), a principled framework for training one-step generative models.
By Daniil Shlenskii, Nikita Gushchin, Lev Novitskiy, Dmitry V. Dylov, Alexander Korotin
arXiv:2607. 19332v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative models have undergone many generations of evolution, from VAEs/GANs to diffusion/flow matching.
By Chirag Vashist, Ke Li