arXiv:2606. 02163v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This article proposes a set-theoretic framework for belief change, called Abstract Worlds Semantics, in which no logical syntax is assumed.
By Daniel Grimaldi, M. Vanina Martinez, Ricardo O. Rodriguez
arXiv:2607. 21210v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing approaches to multi-agent belief combination have established mature foundations for combining uncertain beliefs under common assumptions: consensus methods use iterative averaging, logic-based methods resolve conflicting knowledge bases, and epistemic logic analyzes agents' information states.
By Adam Kostka (Warsaw University of Technology), Jaros{\l}aw A. Chudziak (Warsaw University of Technology)
arXiv:2607. 25094v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Human language is driven by unspoken beliefs and belief updates, making these critical to model for successful communication between large language models (LLMs) and their users.
By Cesare Spinoso-Di Piano, Verna Dankers, Marius Mosbach, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung
arXiv:2605. 02249v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate the belief revision problem in epistemic planning, i.
By Michael Thielscher, Tran Cao Son
arXiv:2606. 31861v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dynamic epistemic logic represents belief change via model transformations induced by epistemic events.
By Gaia Belardinelli (Stanford University), Snow Zhang (University of Berkeley, California)
arXiv:2606. 11724v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Theory of Mind (ToM) reasoning requires inferring agents' beliefs from partial and asymmetric observations, which remains an open challenge for LLMs.
By Chao Lei, Guang Hu, Meng Yang, Yanbei Jiang, Nir Lipovetzky
arXiv:2604. 19791v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Attitude change - the process by which individuals revise their evaluative stances - has been explained by a set of influential but competing verbal theories.
By Jayd Matyas, William A. Cunningham, Alexander Sasha Vezhnevets, Dean Mobbs, Edgar A. Du\'e\~nez-Guzm\'an, Joel Z. Leibo
arXiv:2606. 04751v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in scientific tasks.
By Leonardo Bertolazzi, Katya Tentori, Raffaella Bernardi
arXiv:2607. 22513v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Commercial large language models are increasingly used as knowledge references, yet their stance on contested scientific claims is neither stable nor transparent.
By Davide Scarso, Hugo Noronha de Almeida, Joaquim Pina
arXiv:2505. 11189v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) can amplify misinformation, undermining societal goals such as the UN SDGs.
By Francesco Sovrano
arXiv:2608. 10916v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autoformalisation (AF) systems map natural language reasoning steps into formal statements in a proof assistant such as Lean.
By Rob Cornish, Iacopo Ghinassi, Po-Hung Yeh, Shuqi Liu, Qiyuan Xu, Haoxuan Yin, Dominik Wagner, Wenda Li, Yee Whye Teh, Luke Ong
arXiv:2606. 26523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We develop a framework for interpreting AI systems as agents, drawing on the philosophical tradition of radical interpretation and the tools of mechanistic interpretability.
By Daniel A. Herrmann, Benjamin A. Levinstein