arXiv Computer Vision

Text-Anchored Modality Experts with Uncertainty-Guided Routing for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

The paper introduces TAME, a Text‑Anchored Modality Experts framework that treats language as a fixed, always‑active expert and routes audio‑textual and video‑textual cross‑modal branches as dynamic auxiliary experts. It incorporates lightweight Prophet Heads to estimate sample‑level uncertainty for each modality, guiding a reliability‑aware routing mechanism for expert aggregation. Experiments on CMU‑MOSI, CMU‑MOSEI, and CH‑SIMS show that TAME achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance while reducing parameters by up to 78.7% and FLOPs by up to 41.2% compared to a mixture‑of‑experts baseline.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

MRUF: Multi-granularity Routing with Uncertainty-Aware Fusion for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

arXiv:2607. 10599v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal sentiment analysis relies on language, visual, and acoustic cues, but utterance-level modality quality may vary due to occlusion, background noise, motion blur, or imperfect transcripts, causing conventional fusion to over-trust unreliable modalities.

By Haoran Ma, Yinfeng Yu, Liejun Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 29

Reliability-aware Cross-sample Enhancement for Robust Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

Reliability-aware Cross-sample Enhancement (RCE) is a framework for multimodal sentiment analysis that tackles noise and missing modalities by first applying an adaptive variational information bottleneck to compress unreliable modality information. It then retrieves high‑confidence, semantically consistent neighbors from a large candidate pool to enrich current representations, and finally fuses cross‑modal interactions through a multilevel reliability‑aware mechanism. Experiments show RCE consistently outperforms state‑of‑the‑art methods in full, noisy, and missing‑modality scenarios.

By Menghua Jiang, Haokai Gao, Xiangui Kang, Haifeng Hu, Sijie Mai
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 17

Divide and Conquer: Mixture-of-Bottleneck Experts in Informative Ordinal Space for Video-based Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

The paper proposes a Mixture-of-Bottleneck (MoB) framework for video-based multimodal sentiment analysis that treats sentiment as an ordinal regression problem, splitting it into polarity recognition and intensity prediction. MoB assigns modality‑specific latent experts to each sub‑task, learns compact, task‑relevant representations via an information bottleneck, and fuses these experts with a multimodal bottleneck routing module and hard mining strategy. Experiments on four datasets and language models demonstrate that MoB captures fine‑grained intra‑ and inter‑modal dynamics, improving performance and enabling more trustworthy localization of nuanced sentiment signals.

By Ronghao Lin, Qiaolin He, Zefeng Lu, Yichu Liu, Li Huang, Sijie Mai, Haifeng Hu, Yap-peng Tan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

ReH-FUSE: Reliability-Aware Hierarchical Fusion of Experts for Multimodal Emotion Recognition in Conversation

ReH-FUSE is a reliability‑aware hierarchical fusion framework for multimodal emotion recognition in conversation. It uses a decision‑level router to first compare the relative preference between text and audio, then balances this unimodal mixture with a cross‑modal expert, thereby separating unimodal competition from cross‑modal selection. Experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD show that ReH-FUSE achieves state‑of‑the‑art weighted and macro F1 scores, and ablation studies confirm that learned routing outperforms uniform expert averaging and benefits from cross‑modal interaction.

By Guan-Hua Wen, Hou-Chiang Tseng, Kuan-Yu Chen
arXiv Computation and Language
5d ago

Uncertainty-Guided Multimodal Consensus for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis

The paper introduces Uncertainty‑Guided Multimodal Consensus (UMC) for multimodal sentiment analysis. UMC first recovers continuous unimodal pseudo‑labels using Continuous Prototype‑Guided Label Recovery (CPLR), which blends heteroscedastic predictions with ordered sentiment prototypes and refines them with confidence and label conflict. It then forms a reliability‑aware consensus across modalities via Reliability and Precision Consensus (RPC), which estimates sample‑dependent modality reliability from predictive statistics and cross‑modal disagreement and combines it with predictive precision through a closed‑form solver. Experiments on four public MSA datasets show that UMC outperforms existing methods.

By Guowei Zhong, Junjie Li, Huaiyu Zhu, Ruohong Huan, Yun Pan